首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Family Medicine >Quality of Preventive Care for Diabetes: Effects of Visit Frequency and Competing Demands
【2h】

Quality of Preventive Care for Diabetes: Effects of Visit Frequency and Competing Demands

机译:糖尿病预防护理的质量:就诊频率和竞争需求的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>PURPOSE We sought to determine the association between timely receipt of diabetes-related preventive services and the longitudinal pattern of outpatient service use as characterized by a novel taxonomy that prioritized visits based on the Oregon State Prioritized Health Services List.>METHODS We performed a cross-sectional analysis of mail survey and automated health care data for a population-based sample of patients with diabetes enrolled in a health maintenance organization in Washington State (N = 4,463). Outcomes included American Diabetes Association–recommended preventive services, including regular hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) monitoring, retinal examination, and microalbuminuria screening. Patients with fewer than 8 visits during the 2-year study period were considered infrequent users, while patients with 8 or more visits were classified as lower-priority users if most visits were for conditions of relatively low rank on the Oregon list and as higher-priority users otherwise.>RESULTS After adjustment for social, demographic, and clinical factors, and depression, infrequent users had significantly reduced odds of receiving at least 1 HbA1C test (odds ratio [OR] = 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24–0.51), retinal examination (OR = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.63–0.86), and microalbuminuria screening (OR = 0.75, 95% CI, 0.58–0.96) relative to higher-priority users during the previous year. Lower-priority users also had relatively reduced odds of receiving at least 1 HbA1C test (OR = 0.59, 95% CI, 0.35–1.01), retinal examination (OR = 0.68, 95% CI, 0.56–0.84), and microalbuminuria screening (OR = 0.79, 95% CI, 0.57–1.09) despite attending a similar mean number of total visits as higher-priority users.>CONCLUSIONS Patients who attend relatively few outpatient visits or who attend more frequent visits for predominantly lower-priority conditions are more likely to receive substandard preventive care for diabetes.
机译:>目的我们试图确定及时收到的与糖尿病相关的预防服务与门诊服务使用的纵向模式之间的关联,其特征在于一种新颖的分类法,该分类法根据俄勒冈州优先卫生服务清单对就诊进行了优先排序。 >方法我们对华盛顿州一家健康维护组织(N = 4,463)登记的人群为基础的糖尿病患者样本进行了邮件调查和自动医疗数据的横断面分析。结果包括美国糖尿病协会推荐的预防服务,包括定期的血红蛋白A1C(HbA1C)监测,视网膜检查和微量白蛋白尿筛查。在2年研究期间访问次数少于8次的患者被视为不常使用,而如果访问次数最多的是俄勒冈州列表中相对较低的疾病,而访问次数最多的是8次以上的患者,则将其归为优先级较低的用户。 >结果针对社会,人口统计学和临床​​因素以及抑郁症进行调整后,不频繁的用户接受至少1次HbA1C测试的几率大大降低(赔率[OR] = 0.35,95%置信区间[CI]为0.24-0.51),视网膜检查(OR = 0.74、95%CI,0.63-0.86)和微量白蛋白尿筛查(OR = 0.75、95%CI,0.58-0.96)前一年。优先级较低的使用者接受至少1次HbA1C测试(OR = 0.59,95%CI,0.35–1.01),视网膜检查(OR = 0.68,95%CI,0.56-0.84)和微量白蛋白尿筛查的几率相对降低( OR = 0.79,95%CI,0.57–1.09),尽管平均总访问次数与优先级较高的用户相似。>结论相对而言,门诊就诊次数较少或访问频率较高的患者优先级较低的疾病更有可能接受不合格的糖尿病预防保健。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号