...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of diagnostic pathology >A standardized method for quantifying proliferation by Ki-67 and cyclin A immunohistochemistry in breast cancer
【24h】

A standardized method for quantifying proliferation by Ki-67 and cyclin A immunohistochemistry in breast cancer

机译:一种通过Ki-67和cyclin A免疫组化在乳腺癌中量化增殖的标准化方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Immunohistochemical analysis of proliferation markers such as Ki-67 and cyclin A is widely used in clinical evaluation as a prognostic factor in breast cancer. The proliferation status of tumors is guiding the decision of whether or not a patient should be treated with chemotherapy because low-proliferative tumors are less sensitive by such treatment. However, the lack of optimal cutoff points and selection of tumor areas hamper its use in clinical practice. This study was performed to compare the Ki-67 and cyclin A expression counted in hot-spot vs average counting based on 5 to 14 random tumor areas in 613 breast carcinomas. We correlated the findings with 10-year follow-up in order to standardize the evaluation of proliferation markers in clinical practice. A significant correlation was found between the percentage of positive cells estimated by Ki-67 and cyclin A both by hot-spot and by average counting. Both methods showed that high expression of Ki-67 and cyclin A is associated with more adverse tumor stage. The cutoff value for Ki-67 for distant metastases was set to 22% and to 15%, using hot-spot and average counting, respectively. For cyclin A, the values were set to 14% and 8% using the respective methods. Survival curves revealed that patients with a high hot-spot proliferation index had a significantly greater risk of shorter tumor-free survival. Our findings suggest that the determination of proliferation markers in breast cancer should be standardized to hot-spot counting and that specific cutoff values for proliferation could be useful as prognostic markers in clinical practice. Moreover, we suggest that expression levels of cyclin A could be used as a complementary marker to estimate the proliferation status in tumors, especially those with "borderline" expression levels of Ki-67, in order to more accurately estimate the proliferations status of the tumors. (c) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:增殖标志物如Ki-67和细胞周期蛋白A的免疫组织化学分析已广泛用于临床评估,作为乳腺癌的预后因素。肿瘤的增殖状态指导着是否应该用化学疗法治疗的决定,因为低增殖性肿瘤对这种疗法的敏感性较低。然而,缺乏最佳的临界点和肿瘤区域的选择妨碍了其在临床实践中的使用。这项研究的目的是比较613例乳腺癌中基于5到14个随机肿瘤区域的热点中计数的Ki-67和细胞周期蛋白A表达与平均计数。我们将研究结果与10年随访相关联,以标准化临床实践中增殖标志物的评估。通过热点和平均计数,通过Ki-67和cyclin A估计的阳性细胞百分比之间发现显着相关性。两种方法均显示,Ki-67和细胞周期蛋白A的高表达与更不利的肿瘤分期有关。使用热点和平均计数分别将Ki-67远处转移的临界值设置为22%和15%。对于细胞周期蛋白A,使用相应的方法将值设置为14%和8%。生存曲线表明,热点扩散指数高的患者无瘤生存期缩短的风险明显更高。我们的研究结果表明,乳腺癌中增殖标志物的测定应标准化用于热点计数,并且特定的增殖临界值可在临床实践中用作预后标志物。此外,我们建议细胞周期蛋白A的表达水平可以用作补充标记,以评估肿瘤的增殖状态,尤其是那些具有“边界”表达水平的Ki-67的增殖状态,以便更准确地评估肿瘤的增殖状态。 。 (c)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号