...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of epidemiology >The Family Risk Score for coronary heart disease: associations with lipids, lipoproteins, and body habitus in a middle-aged bi-racial cohort: The ARIC study.
【24h】

The Family Risk Score for coronary heart disease: associations with lipids, lipoproteins, and body habitus in a middle-aged bi-racial cohort: The ARIC study.

机译:ARIC研究显示,冠心病的家庭风险评分:与中年双种族人群中的脂质,脂蛋白和身体习性相关。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To examine the association between the Family Risk Score (FRS) for coronary heart disease (CHD) and body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), high density lipoprotein (HDL) and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, and lipoprotein(a) protein [Lp(a)]. METHODS: FRS was computed from observed and expected CHD events using family data collected from 11467 black and white adults of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC). BMI, WHR, and lipids adjusted for study center, race, education, BMI (except BMI), WHR (except for BMI and WHR), cigarette smoking, alcohol, and Keys' score were compared among low (FRS < -0.5), average (-0.5 to 0.5), and high (> 0.5) FRS using analysis of covariance. The association between FRS and these risk factors was compared to that for simpler estimates of family risk. RESULTS: Adjusted means of BMI, WHR, LDL, LP(a), and triglycerides were positively associated with FRS, whereas HDL cholesterol was inversely associated with FRS. Of demographic and behavioral factors, cigarette smoking was most strongly associated with FRS. Based on additional comparisons of adjusted means, high vs. low levels of FRS appear to correlate better with CHD risk factors than do the simpler family history assessments. CONCLUSIONS: In situations were genetic or clinical information is not available, FRS may be a favorable measure of familial burden for CHD.
机译:目的:检查冠心病(CHD)的家庭风险评分(FRS)与体重指数(BMI),腰臀比(WHR),高密度脂蛋白(HDL)和低密度脂蛋白( LDL)胆固醇,甘油三酸酯和脂蛋白(a)蛋白[Lp(a)]。方法:FRS是根据社区研究(ARIC)中从11467名黑人和白人的动脉粥样硬化风险中收集的家庭数据,根据观察到的和预期的CHD事件计算得出的。比较低(FRS <-0.5),经研究中心,种族,教育,BMI(BMI除外),WHR(BMI和WHR除外),吸烟,饮酒和Keys得分调整过的BMI,WHR和血脂,使用协方差分析得出的平均(-0.5至0.5)和高(> 0.5)FRS。将FRS与这些风险因素之间的关联与对家庭风险的简单估计进行了比较。结果:BMI,WHR,LDL,LP(a)和甘油三酸酯的调整均值与FRS呈正相关,而HDL胆固醇与FRS呈负相关。在人口和行为因素中,吸烟与FRS密切相关。根据调整后平均值的其他比较,与简单的家族史评估相比,高水平和低水平的FRS与CHD危险因素的相关性似乎更好。结论:在无法获得遗传或临床信息的情况下,FRS可能是冠心病家族负担的有利指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号