首页> 外文期刊>Dyslexia >Does CBM maze assess reading comprehension in 8-9-year olds at-risk for dyslexia?
【24h】

Does CBM maze assess reading comprehension in 8-9-year olds at-risk for dyslexia?

机译:CBM MAZE是否评估了8-9岁的孩子患有诵读障碍的阅读理解?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent research has reported the word-level, code-related focus of curriculum-based measures (CBM) of reading comprehension such as Maze (Muijselaar et al., 2017) with typically developing readers, but research has yet to examine whether this finding also applies to children at-risk for dyslexia. We administered a collection of cognitive, linguistic, CBM, and norm-referenced measures to children whose word reading and decoding fluency fell below the 25th percentile and were, therefore, considered at-risk readers. We found that language comprehension contributed additional variance beyond decoding (fluency and accuracy measures) to reading comprehension as assessed by the WIAT-III, but that decoding explained the most variance in children's performance on the CBM Maze task (vis a vis the simple view of reading). The findings have practical implications to the use of CBM Maze as a formative assessment with children at-risk for dyslexia and elucidate the need for additional or alternative assessments to capture the reading comprehension construct.
机译:最近的研究报告了迷宫(Muijselaar et al.,2017)等阅读理解的基于课程的测量(CBM)的单词级、代码相关重点,以及典型的发展中读者,但研究尚未检验这一发现是否也适用于有阅读障碍风险的儿童。我们对单词阅读和解码流利度低于25%的儿童实施了一系列认知、语言、CBM和常模参考测量,因此,这些儿童被视为高危读者。我们发现,在WIAT-III评估的阅读理解中,除了解码(流利度和准确性测量)之外,语言理解对阅读理解有额外的影响,但解码解释了儿童在CBM迷宫任务中表现的最大差异(相对于简单的阅读观)。研究结果对CBM迷宫作为阅读障碍风险儿童的形成性评估具有实际意义,并阐明了需要额外或替代评估来获取阅读理解结构。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号