首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery: MRCAS >Surgical outcomes of conventional laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy
【24h】

Surgical outcomes of conventional laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy

机译:常规腹腔镜和机器人辅助子宫切除术的手术结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to compare surgical outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with those of the robotic approach using the da Vinci Xi system. Methods: Patients who underwent hysterectomy with da Vinci Xi for early endo-metrial cancer or benign indications from 2018 to 2019 were selected. The control group consisted of patients who underwent conventional laparoscopy. Results: A total of 300 patients were included in the study. The mean duration of surgery differed significantly (p = 0.025) between those who underwent laparoscopy (125.01 ± 76.168) and robotic-assisted surgery (142.96 ± 82.657 min). Blood loss, median hospital stay, intraoperative and postoperative complications were similar in both groups. No statistical difference was observed in the subgroups with a body mass index of more than 30 kg/m~2 or more than 40 kg/m~2 concerning the duration of surgery or the surgical outcome. onclusion: The da Vinci Xi did not improve surgical outcomes in patients who underwent hysterectomy by trained laparoscopists and takes more time than conventional laparoscopy when performed in patients of normal weight.
机译:引言:本研究的目的是比较腹腔镜手术的结果与达文西的席氏系统的机器人方法。方法:选择达文西席状切除术治疗早期子宫内膜癌或良性病变2018~2019岁的患者。对照组包括接受常规腹腔镜检查的患者。结果:共有300名患者被纳入研究。腹腔镜手术组(125.01±76.168)和机器人辅助手术组(142.96±82.657分钟)的平均手术时间差异显著(p=0.025)。两组的失血量、平均住院时间、术中和术后并发症相似。体重指数大于30 kg/m2或大于40 kg/m2的亚组在手术持续时间或手术结果方面无统计学差异。结论:达文西席并没有提高接受腹腔镜手术的患者的手术效果,而在正常体重的患者中,手术时间比常规腹腔镜手术时间长。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号