首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Comparison of minimally invasive surgical approaches for hysterectomy at a community hospital: robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy
【2h】

Comparison of minimally invasive surgical approaches for hysterectomy at a community hospital: robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy

机译:社区医院子宫切除术的微创外科手术方法比较:机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术和腹腔镜阴道上子宫切除术

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The study reported here compares outcomes of three approaches to minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications, namely, robotic-assisted laparoscopic (RALH), laparoscopic-assisted vaginal (LAVH) and laparoscopic supracervical (LSH) hysterectomy. The total patient cohort comprised the first 237 patients undergoing robotic surgeries at our hospital between August 2007 and June 2009; the last 100 patients undergoing LAVH by the same surgeons between July 2006 and February 2008 and 165 patients undergoing LAVHs performed by nine surgeons between January 2008 and June 2009; 87 patients undergoing LSH by the same nine surgeons between January 2008 and June 2009. Among the RALH patients were cases of greater complexity: (1) higher prevalence of prior abdominopelvic surgery than that found among LAVH patients; (2) an increased number of procedures for endometriosis and pelvic reconstruction. Uterine weights also were greater in RALH patients [207.4 vs. 149.6 (LAVH; P < 0.001) and 141.1 g (LSH; P = 0.005)]. Despite case complexity, operative time was significantly lower in RALH than in LAVH (89.9 vs. 124.8 min, P < 0.001) and similar to that in LSH (89.6 min). Estimated blood loss was greater in LAVH (167.9 ml) than in RALH (59.0 ml, P < 0.001) or LSH (65.7 ml, P < 0.001). Length of hospital stay was shorter for RALH than for LAVH or LSH. Conversion and complication rates were low and similar across procedures. Multivariable regression indicated that LAVH, obesity, uterine weight ≥250 g and older age predicted significantly longer operative time. The learning curve for RALH demonstrated improved operative time over the case series. Our findings show the benefits of RALH over LAVH. Outcomes in RALH can be as good as or better than those in LSH, suggesting the latter should be the choice primarily for women desiring cervix-sparing surgery.
机译:此处报道的研究比较了三种用于良性适应症的微创子宫切除术的效果,即机器人辅助腹腔镜(RALH),腹腔镜辅助阴道(LAVH)和腹腔镜aro上(LSH)子宫切除术。在2007年8月至2009年6月间,我院共有237名接受机器人手术的患者。在2006年7月至2008年2月之间,由同一名外科医生进行的最后100例接受LAVH手术;在2008年1月至2009年6月之间,由9名外科医师进行了165例接受LAVH手术的患者;在2008年1月至2009年6月期间,由9位外科医生进行的LSH手术患者共87例。在RALH患者中,复杂性更高:(1)先前的腹腔盆腔手术患病率高于LAVH患者; (2)子宫内膜异位症和骨盆重建术的程序增多。 RALH患者的子宫重量也更大[207.4 vs. 149.6(LAVH; P <0.001)和141.1 g(LSH; P = 0.005)]。尽管病例复杂,但RALH的手术时间显着低于LAVH(89.9 vs.124.8 min,P <0.001),与LSH相似(89.6 min)。 LAVH(167.9 ml)的估计失血量比RALH(59.0 ml,P <0.001)或LSH(65.7 ml,P <0.001)大。 RALH的住院时间短于LAVH或LSH。转化率和并发症发生率很低,并且在整个过程中相似。多变量回归分析表明,LAVH,肥胖,子宫重量≥250g和年龄较大者预示手术时间明显延长。相对于病例系列,RALH的学习曲线证明了手术时间的缩短。我们的发现表明,RALH优于LAVH。 RALH的结果可以和LSH一样好或更好,这表明后者应主要是希望进行保留子宫颈手术的女性的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号