...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of hematology >Core needle biopsies and surgical excision biopsies in the diagnosis of lymphoma-experience at the Lymph Node Registry Kiel
【24h】

Core needle biopsies and surgical excision biopsies in the diagnosis of lymphoma-experience at the Lymph Node Registry Kiel

机译:核心针穿刺活检和手术切除活检在淋巴结登记处基尔的淋巴瘤经验诊断中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Current guidelines of the European Society of Medical Oncology recommend surgical excision biopsies of lymph nodes for the diagnosis of lymphoma whenever possible. However, core needle biopsies are increasingly used. We aimed to understand the common practice to choose the method of biopsy in Germany. Furthermore, we wanted to understand performance of surgical excision and core needle biopsies of lymph nodes in the diagnosis of lymphoma. The files of 1510 unselected, consecutive lymph node specimens from a consultation center for lymphoma diagnosis were analyzed. Core needle biopsies were obtained frequently from lymph nodes localized in mediastinal, abdominal, retroperitoneal, or thoracic regions. Patients undergoing core needle biopsies were significantly older and suffered significantly more often from lymphoma than patients undergoing surgical excision biopsies. Although more immunohistochemical tests were ordered by the pathologist for core needle biopsies specimens than for surgical excision biopsies specimens, core needle biopsies did not yield a definite diagnosis in 8.3 % of cases, compared to 2.8 % for SEB (p = 0.0003). Restricting the analysis to cases with a final diagnosis of follicular lymphoma or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, core needle biopsies identified a simultaneous low- and high-grade lymphoma (transformation) in 3.3 % of cases, compared to 7.6 % for surgical excision biopsies (p = 0.2317). In Germany, core needle biopsies are preferentially used in elderly patients with a high likelihood of suffering from lymphoma. Core needle appeared inferior to surgical excision biopsies at providing a definite diagnosis and at identifying multiple lymphoma differentiations and transformation.
机译:欧洲医学肿瘤学会的现行指南建议在可能的情况下,对淋巴结进行手术切除活检以诊断淋巴瘤。但是,越来越多地使用芯针活检。我们旨在了解在德国选择活检方法的常见做法。此外,我们想了解手术切除和淋巴结核心针穿刺活检在淋巴瘤诊断中的性能。分析了来自咨询中心用于淋巴瘤诊断的1510例未选择的连续淋巴结标本的文件。经常从位于纵隔,腹部,腹膜后或胸腔区域的淋巴结中获取针头活检标本。与接受外科切除活检的患者相比,接受核心针穿刺活检的患者年龄更大,并且淋巴瘤的患病率明显更高。尽管病理学家要求对穿刺针活检标本进行的免疫组织化学检查要比对手术切除活检标本进行的免疫组织化学检查多,但在8.3%的病例中,对穿刺活检没有明确的诊断,而SEB的确诊率为2.8%(p = 0.0003)。将分析仅限于最终诊断为滤泡性淋巴瘤或弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的病例,核心针穿刺活检在3.3%的病例中同时鉴别出低度和高度淋巴瘤(转化),而手术切除活检则为7.6% (p = 0.2317)。在德国,对于患有淋巴瘤的可能性较高的老年患者,优先使用芯针活检。核心针在提供明确的诊断以及鉴定多种淋巴瘤的分化和转化方面不如手术切除活检。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号