首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Translational Research >Impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy in newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer patients with suspicious node: a comparative accuracy survey of fine-needle aspiration biopsy versus core-needle biopsy
【2h】

Impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy in newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer patients with suspicious node: a comparative accuracy survey of fine-needle aspiration biopsy versus core-needle biopsy

机译:前哨淋巴结活检对新诊断的可疑浸润性乳腺癌患者的影响:细针穿刺活检与芯针活检的比较准确性调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Comparing diagnostic accuracy study between ultrasonography (US) guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and core-needle biopsy (CNB) of the Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer patients. We selected 289 newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer patients from June 2015 to July 2017. Ultrasound (US) guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNA) and core-needle biopsy (CNB) was performed to identify patients with suspicious sentinel lymph node (SLN). Patients with a cortical thickness > 2 mm or atypical morphological characteristics were recommended FNA and CNB. Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was applied to patients with biopsy-proven metastasis, and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was applied to FNA or CNB negative patients. ALND was also performed when SNB is positive. Out of 289 patients, only 131 patients met final study criteria. Lymph node status was evaluated by FNA, CNB, SLND, and ALND. Among 131 patients, 45 were deemed positive for metastasis and 86 were determined to be negative with CNB, whereas 38 were deemed positive for metastasis and 93 were determined to be negative by using FNAB. CNB was used to correctly identify seven axillae as positive for metastasis that were deemed negative by using FNAB. There were no positive FNAB results in axillae that were negative for metastasis with CNB. All patients underwent SLNB and those with biopsy-proved axillary metastases were assigned directly to ALND as the primary staging procedure. The final histopathologic assessment indicated that 50 (38.2%) of the 131 axillae studied had axillary LN metastases. Axillary US-guided CNB was used to correctly identify 45 (90.0%) of the 50 LN-positive axillae, whereas axillary US-guided FNAB was used to correctly identify 38 (76.0%, P < 0. 001). There were no false-positive results. CNB netted 5 false-negative results, and FNAB resulted in 12. There was significantly different accuracy between different diagnostic tools. In our study, we demonstrated that CNB is a more reliable approach than FNA for the preoperative diagnosis of SLN metastasis.
机译:在新诊断的浸润性乳腺癌患者中,超声(美国)引导的细针穿刺活检(FNAB)和前哨淋巴结(SLN)的芯针活检(CNB)之间的诊断准确性研究进行比较。我们从2015年6月至2017年7月选择了289例新诊断的浸润性乳腺癌患者。进行了超声(美国)引导的细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNA)和芯针活检(CNB)以确定可疑前哨淋巴结(SLN)的患者。皮层厚度> 2 mm或非典型形态特征的患者建议使用FNA和CNB。腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)用于活检证实为转移的患者,前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)用于FNA或CNB阴性的患者。当SNB为正时,也执行ALND。在289名患者中,只有131名患者符合最终研究标准。通过FNA,CNB,SLND和ALND评估淋巴结状态。在131例患者中,使用FNAB认为45例转移阳性,86例CNB阴性,而38例认为阳性,93例阴性。 CNB被用来正确识别7例转移阳性的腋窝,而FNAB认为这是阴性。没有腋窝FNAB阳性结果,而CNB转移阴性。所有接受SLNB治疗的患者以及经活检证实为腋窝转移的患者均被直接分配至ALND作为主要分期程序。最终的组织病理学评估表明,研究的131例腋窝中有50例(38.2%)有腋窝LN转移。腋窝US引导的CNB用于正确识别50个LN阳性腋窝中的45个(90.0%),而腋窝US引导的FNAB用于正确识别38个(76.0%,P <0. 001)。没有假阳性结果。 CNB获得了5个假阴性结果,而FNAB得到了12个结果。不同诊断工具之间的准确性存在显着差异。在我们的研究中,我们证明了CNB比FNA更可靠的方法可用于SLN转移的术前诊断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号