首页> 外文期刊>Analytical Biochemistry: An International Journal of Analytical and Preparative Methods >Comparison of different approaches for evaluation of the detection and quantitation limits of a purity method: A case study using a capillary isoelectrofocusing method for a monoclonal antibody
【24h】

Comparison of different approaches for evaluation of the detection and quantitation limits of a purity method: A case study using a capillary isoelectrofocusing method for a monoclonal antibody

机译:评估纯度方法的检测限和定量限的不同方法的比较:以毛细管等电聚焦方法为单克隆抗体的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Several different techniques suggested by the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Q2R1 guideline were used to assess the signal and concentration at the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) for a purity method. These approaches were exemplified with a capillary isoelectro-focusing (cIF) method, which has been developed to quantify the distribution of the charge isoforms of a monoclonal antibody. The charge isoforms are the result of incomplete posttranslational processing of C-terminal lysine residues of the heavy chain by carboxypeptidase. Results showed no significant discrepancy between LOD/LOQ obtained by the different techniques. Validation experiments corroborated the calculated LOQ. The results indicate that any single technique can provide meaningful values for the LOD and LOQ. Finally, important points to consider when applying these techniques to purity methods are discussed. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:使用国际协调会议(ICH)Q2R1指南建议的几种不同技术来评估纯度方法的检测限(LOD)和定量限(LOQ)的信号和浓度。这些方法以毛细管等电聚焦(cIF)方法为例,该方法已被开发用来量化单克隆抗体电荷同工型的分布。电荷同工型是羧肽酶对重链C末端赖氨酸残基进行不完全翻译后加工的结果。结果表明,通过不同技术获得的LOD / LOQ之间没有显着差异。验证实验证实了计算出的LOQ。结果表明,任何一种技术都可以为LOD和LOQ提供有意义的值。最后,讨论了将这些技术应用于纯度方法时要考虑的要点。 (C)2008 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号