首页> 外文期刊>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry >Comparison of two quantitative GC-MS methods for analysis of tomato aroma based on purge-and-trap and on solid-phase microextraction
【24h】

Comparison of two quantitative GC-MS methods for analysis of tomato aroma based on purge-and-trap and on solid-phase microextraction

机译:基于吹扫捕集和固相微萃取的两种定量GC-MS分析番茄香气的方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two analytical procedures, one based on purge-and-trap and the other on solid phase microextraction, both followed by GC-MS measurement using an ion-trap mass spectrometer in the electron impact mode, have been developed for determination and quantitation of up to 39 aroma compounds in fresh tomatoes. The method based on purge-and-trap for isolation of the volatile compounds uses Tenax as adsorbent and a hexane-diethyl ether mixture as solvent for elution. The method was validated for linearity, precision (better than 20% for most compounds), and limit of detection, which was approximately 1 ng g(-1). This method enabled identification of up to 30 compounds in real samples. Use of SPME was considered as an alternative, to simplify sample treatment while maintaining the information level for the samples (e.g. the number of compounds detected) and quality of quantitation. A procedure based on SPME using a Carboxen/ polydimethylsiloxane fibre was developed and validated for determination of 29 aroma compounds; precision was better than 20% and limits of detection ranged from 4 to 30 ng g(-1).
机译:已开发出两种分析程序,一种基于吹扫捕集,另一种基于固相微萃取,然后通过离子阱质谱仪在电子碰撞模式下进行GC-MS测量,以测定和定量分析。新鲜番茄中的39种香气化合物。基于吹扫捕集法分离挥发性化合物的方法使用Tenax作为吸附剂,并使用己烷-乙醚混合物作为洗脱溶剂。验证了该方法的线性,精密度(大多数化合物小于20%)和检测限(大约1 ng g(-1))。这种方法可以鉴定真实样品中多达30种化合物。可以考虑使用SPME作为一种替代方法,以简化样品处理,同时保持样品的信息水平(例如,检测到的化合物数量)和定量质量。开发了一种基于SPME的方法,该方法使用的是Carboxen /聚二甲基硅氧烷纤维,可用于测定29种香气化合物。精度优于20%,检测范围为4到30 ng g(-1)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号