首页> 外文期刊>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. >Clinical Outcomes of Oral Suspension versus Delayed-Release Tablet Formulations of Posaconazole for Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Infections
【24h】

Clinical Outcomes of Oral Suspension versus Delayed-Release Tablet Formulations of Posaconazole for Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Infections

机译:口腔悬浮液与延迟释放片剂配方的临床结果对侵袭性真菌感染的预防

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Posaconazole is used for prophylaxis for invasive fungal infections (IFIs) among patients with hematologic malignancies. We compared the incidence of breakthrough IFIs and early discontinuation between patients receiving delayed-release tablet and oral suspension formulations of posaconazole. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients receiving posaconazole between 1 January 2010 and 30 June 2016. We defined probable or proven breakthrough IFIs using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria. Overall, 547 patients received 860 courses of posaconazole (53% received the oral suspension and 48% received the tablet); primary indications for prophylaxis were acute myeloid leukemia (69%), graft-versus-host disease (18%), and myelodysplastic syndrome (3%). There were no significant differences in demographics or indications between patients receiving the different formulations. The incidence and incidence rate of probable or proven IFIs were 1.6% and 3.2 per 10,000 posaconazole days, respectively. There was no significant difference in the rate of IFIs between suspension courses (2.8 per 10,000 posaconazole days) and tablet courses (3.7 per 10,000 posaconazole days) (rate ratio = 0.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.3 to 2.3). Of the 14 proven or probable cases of IFI, 8/14 had posaconazole serum concentrations measured, and the concentrations in 7/8 were above 0.7 mu g/ml. Posaconazole was discontinued early in 15.5% of courses; however, the frequency of discontinuation was also not significantly different between the tablet (16.5%) and oral suspension (14.6%) formulations (95% CI for difference = -0.13 to 0.06). In conclusion, the incidence of breakthrough IFIs was low among patients receiving posaconazole prophylaxis and not significantly different between patients receiving the tablet formulation and those receiving the oral suspension formulation.
机译:血清酰唑用于预防血液学恶性肿瘤患者的侵袭性真菌感染(IFIS)。我们比较了接受延迟释放片剂和口腔悬浮制剂的患者突破IFIS和早期停药的发生率。这是2010年1月1日至2016年6月30日接受Posaconazole的患者的回顾性队列研究。我们使用欧洲研究和治疗癌症(EORTC)标准的欧洲组织来定义可能的或经过证明的突破性IFIS。总体而言,547名患者接受了860次的育唑(53%)接受口腔悬浮液和48%收到平板电脑);预防的主要适应症是急性髓性白血病(69%),移植物与宿主疾病(18%)和髓细胞增生综合征(3%)。接受不同配方的患者之间的人口统计数据或适应症没有显着差异。可能或经过验证的IFIS的发病率和发病率分别为每10,000天/丙基唑天为1.6%和3.2。悬浮课程(每10,000个海康唑天数2.8)和片剂课程之间没有显着差异(每10,000个海康康天数3.7)(率比率= 0.8,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.3至2.3)。在IFI的14例经过证明或可能的情况下,8/14具有测量的posaconazole血清浓度,7/8中的浓度高于0.7μg/ ml。在15.5%的课程早期停产了波萨哥康唑;然而,在片剂(16.5%)和口服悬浮液(14.6%)制剂(差异为95%CI = -0.13至0.06)之间,停止频率也没有显着差异。总之,接受皮萨昔唑预防患者的突破性IFIS的发病率低,并且在接受片剂配方的患者之间没有显着差异,并且接受口腔悬浮制剂的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号