首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology >Mathematical Modeling of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Function: What Can We Learn from Empirical and Mechanistic Models?
【24h】

Mathematical Modeling of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Function: What Can We Learn from Empirical and Mechanistic Models?

机译:G蛋白耦合受体功能的数学建模:我们可以从实证和机械模型中学到什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Empirical and mechanistic models differ in their approaches to the analysis of pharmacological effect. Whereas the parameters of the former are not physical constants those of the latter embody the nature, often complex, of biology. Empirical models are exclusively used for curve fitting, merely to characterize the shape of the E/[A] curves. Mechanistic models, on the contrary, enable the examination of mechanistic hypotheses by parameter simulation. Regretfully, the many parameters that mechanistic models may include can represent a great difficulty for curve fitting, representing, thus, a challenge for computational method development. In the present study some empirical and mechanistic models are shown and the connections, which may appear in a number of cases between them, are analyzed from the curves they yield. It may be concluded that systematic and careful curve shape analysis can be extremely useful for the understanding of receptor function, ligand classification and drug discovery, thus providing a common language for the communication between pharmacologists and medicinal chemists.
机译:实证和机械模型在其对药理学效应分析的方法中不同。虽然前者的参数不是物理常数,后者的物理常量体现了生物学的性质,通常复杂。经验模型专门用于曲线拟合,仅仅是表征E / [A]曲线的形状。相反,机械模型通过参数仿真来检查机械假设。遗憾的是,机械模型可以包括的许多参数可以包括曲线拟合的很大困难,代表计算方法开发的挑战。在本研究中,示出了一些经验和机械模型,并且可以从它们屈服的曲线分析它们之间的许多情况下的连接。可以得出结论,系统和仔细的曲线形状分析对于理解受体功能,配体分类和药物发现非常有用,从而为药剂学家和药物化学家之间的沟通提供共同的语言。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号