首页> 外文期刊>Cancer: A Journal of the American Cancer Society >Discrepant HPV/Cytology Cotesting Results: Are There Differences Between Cytology-Negative Versus HPV-Negative Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia?
【24h】

Discrepant HPV/Cytology Cotesting Results: Are There Differences Between Cytology-Negative Versus HPV-Negative Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia?

机译:差异HPV /细胞学Cotesting结果:细胞学阴性与HPV阴性宫颈上皮内瘤的差异有差异吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions sub-categorized as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia-3 (CIN-3)-positive after a negative cytology result but positive for high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) testing to those with a negative HR-HPV test but positive cytology (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS]-positive/HPV-negative) and to assess reasons for discrepancies. METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed women who underwent screening with cytology and HPV testing from 2010 through 2013. After a review of surgical specimens and cytology, discrepancies were classified as sampling or interpretation error. Clinical and pathologic findings were compared. RESULTS: In total, 15,173 women (age range, 25-95 years; 7.1% were aged < 30 years) underwent both HPV and cytologic testing, and 1184 (8.4%) underwent biopsy. Cytology was positive in 19.4% of specimens, and HPV was positive in 14.5%. Eighty-four CIN-3-positive specimens were detected, including 55 that tested ASCUS-positive/HPV-positive, 11 that tested negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM)/HPV-positive, 10 that tested ASCUS-positive/HPV-negative, 3 that tested NILM/HPV-negative, and 5 tests that were unsatisfactory. There was no significant difference between NILM/HPV-positive and ASCUS-positive/HPV-negative CIN-3 in terms of size, time to occurrence, the presence of a cytopathic effect, screening history, race, or age. Six of 11 NILM/HPV-positive cases were reclassified as ASCUS, indicating an interpreting error of 55% and a sampling error of 45%. No ASCUS-positive/HPV-negative cases were reclassified. Seven cases of CIN-3 with positive cytology were HPV-negative. CONCLUSIONS: There are no significant clinical or pathologic differences between NILM/HPV-positive and ASCUS-positive/HPV-negative CIN-3-positive specimens. Cytologic sampling or interpretation remains the main reason for discrepancies. However, HPV-negative CIN-3 with positive cytology exists and may be missed by primary HPV screening. (C) 2017 American Cancer Society.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是将宫颈化高级鳞状上皮内病变与阴性细胞学效果的阴性细胞学效果进行了分类为宫颈上皮内瘤瘤-3(CIN-3),但为高风险人类乳头瘤病毒(HR-HPV )对具有负HR-HPV测试但阳性细胞学的人进行测试(未确定意义的非典型鳞状细胞[Accus] - 呈阳性/ HPV-否),并评估差异的原因。方法:作者回顾性分析了2010年至2013年从2010年筛选细胞学和HPV测试的妇女。在审查外科标本和细胞学后,将差异被归类为采样或解释误差。比较了临床和病理结果。结果:总共15,173名女性(年龄范围,25-95岁; 7.1%均为<30年),进行了HPV和细胞学检测,1184(8.4%)接受活组织检查。细胞学在19.4%的标本中为阳性,HPV为阳性14.5%。检测到八十四个CIN-3阳性标本,其中55次测试的亚乙酯阳性/ HPV阳性,11,用于上皮内病变或恶性肿瘤(NILM)/ HPV阳性,10的试验后的ASCUS阳性/ HPV-阴性,3,测试尼尔/ HPV阴性,5个令人不满意的测试。尼尔姆/ HPV阳性和Ascus阳性/ HPV阴性Cin-3之间没有显着差异,发生时间,发生细胞病变,筛查历史,种族或年龄。 11个尼尔/ HPV阳性病例中的六种含量为ASCUS,表明解释误差为55%,采样误差为45%。没有亚乙酯阳性/ HPV阴性病例重新分类。具有阳性细胞学的7例Cin-3患者是HPV阴性。结论:尼尔/ HPV阳性和亚乙酯阳性/ HPV阴性CIN-3阳性标本没有显着的临床或病理差异。细胞学抽样或解释仍然是差异差异的主要原因。然而,具有阳性细胞学的HPV阴性Cin-3存在,并且可以通过原发性HPV筛选错失。 (c)2017年美国癌症协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号