...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics >Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy.
【24h】

Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy.

机译:支架剥离后牙釉质表面的评估:扫描电子显微镜的体内研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

INTRODUCTION: The purposes of this in-vivo study were to compare the modes of failure of uncoated and adhesive precoated metal brackets by using the adhesive remnant index, and to assess the quality of the enamel surface after cleanup by using the enamel damage index. METHODS: Twelve Victory brackets (group A) and 12 Victory adhesive precoated brackets (group B) (both, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) were bonded onto the maxillary second premolars of 12 volunteers. The uncoated brackets were bonded with Transbond XT adhesive resin (3M Unitek). Replicas of the teeth were made before bonding (T0), after bracket removal (T1), and after cleanup (T2). Scanning electron microscope images of all labial enamel surfaces were taken at T0, T1, and T2, and these were evaluated according to the adhesive remnant index and the enamel damage index. RESULTS: Evaluation of the adhesive remnant index scores with the chi-square test showed no statistically significant difference between the groups. Evaluation of the enamel damage index grades with the sign test for paired samples showed a statistically significant difference (P <0.01) between T0 and T2. CONCLUSIONS: Uncoated and precoated brackets exhibited similar debonding patterns. Additionally, the debonding method tested in this study did not restore the original enamel surface, although there was no clinically relevant enamel damage.
机译:引言:这项体内研究的目的是通过使用残余胶粘剂指数来比较未涂覆和预涂粘合剂的金属托的失效模式,并通过使用搪瓷损伤指数来评估清理后的搪瓷表面质量。方法:将十二个Victory托槽(A组)和12个Victory粘合剂预涂托槽(B组)(均为3M Unitek,Monrovia,Calif)粘合到12名志愿者的上颌第二前磨牙上。未涂覆的托架用Transbond XT粘合树脂(3M Unitek)粘合。在粘接之前(T0),托槽拆除(T1)和清理之后(T2)制作牙齿的复制品。在T0,T1和T2处获取所有唇釉质表面的扫描电子显微镜图像,并根据粘合残余指数和釉质损伤指数对其进行评估。结果:用卡方检验评估粘着剂残留指数得分,表明两组之间无统计学差异。用配对样品的符号测试评估牙釉质损害指数等级,表明T0和T2之间存在统计学上的显着差异(P <0.01)。结论:未涂覆和预涂覆的托槽表现出相似的脱粘模式。此外,尽管没有临床上相关的牙釉质损害,但本研究中测试的脱胶方法并未恢复原始的牙釉质表面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号