首页> 外文期刊>Srpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvo >Scanning electron microscopic examination of enamel surface after fixed orthodontic treatment: In-vivo study
【24h】

Scanning electron microscopic examination of enamel surface after fixed orthodontic treatment: In-vivo study

机译:固定正畸治疗后牙釉质表面的扫描电子显微镜检查:体内研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction. Therapy with fixed orthodontic appliances starts with bracket bonding and ends with debonding of brackets, leaving enamel surface varied. Objective. The aim of this pilot study was to examine enamel surface before and after debonding of orthodontic brackets by the use of scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Methods. Epoxy replicas of four patients’ premolars indicated for therapy with fixed orthodontic appliances were made and brackets were bonded to their teeth with a different adhesives (Enlight, No-mix, Fuji Ortho LC and Heliosit Orthodontic) (n=4). Two months later, brackets on premolars were debonded and amounts of adhesive left on the tooth surfaces and the bracket bases were evaluated with the adhesive remnant index (ARI). After resin removal, epoxy replicas were made and the surface of premolars was evaluated with the enamel surface index (ESI). All replicas of premolars (n=32) were prepared for SEM examination and compared under different magnifications. Tooth damage was estimated based on correlation between ARItooth and ESI. Results. Pearson’s χ2 test showed no significant differences between ARItooth and ARIbracket of four materials used. Nonparametric correlations showed significant differences between ARItooth and ARIbracket, ESI and ARItooth, and between ESI and ARIbracket. Increasing of ARItooth is followed with the descent of ARIbracket and the ascent of ESI. Multivariate regression analysis showed a significant correlation between ESI and ARItooth. Conclusion. Most bond failures took place at enamel-adhesive interface. ARItooth was a predictor to enamel surface damage. The type of material did not affect enamel surface damage.
机译:介绍。用固定的正畸矫治器进行的治疗始于托槽粘接,然后以托槽解粘接结束,从而使牙釉质表面变化。目的。这项初步研究的目的是通过使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)来检查正畸托槽粘接前后的牙釉质表面。方法。制作了四个患者的前臼齿的环氧复制品,用于固定牙齿正畸矫治器的治疗,并用不同的粘合剂(Enlight,No-mix,Fuji Ortho LC和Heliosit Orthodontic)将托槽粘合到牙齿上(n = 4)。两个月后,将前磨牙上的托槽剥离,并用残留粘合剂指数(ARI)评估牙齿表面和托槽基部上残留的粘合剂量。除去树脂后,制作环氧复制品,并用瓷釉表面指数(ESI)评估前磨牙的表面。准备所有前磨牙的复制品(n = 32)用于SEM检查,并在不同放大倍数下进行比较。根据ARItooth和ESI之间的相关性估算牙齿损伤。结果。 Pearson的χ2检验表明,使用的四种材料的ARItooth和ARIbracket之间没有显着差异。非参数相关性显示ARItooth和ARIbracket,ESI和ARItooth之间以及ESI和ARIbracket之间存在显着差异。 ARItocket的下降和ESI的上升伴随着ARItooth的增加。多元回归分析显示ESI和ARItooth之间存在显着相关性。结论。大多数粘结失败发生在搪瓷-胶粘剂界面。 ARItooth是搪瓷表面损伤的预测因子。材料类型不影响搪瓷表面损伤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号