首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Kidney Diseases: The official journal of the National Kidney Foundation >A randomized clinical trial of immunization with combined hepatitis A and B versus hepatitis B alone for hepatitis B seroprotection in hemodialysis patients.
【24h】

A randomized clinical trial of immunization with combined hepatitis A and B versus hepatitis B alone for hepatitis B seroprotection in hemodialysis patients.

机译:一项针对血液透析患者的乙肝和乙肝联合血清免疫保护的甲型和乙型肝炎联合单纯乙型肝炎免疫接种的随机临床试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend immunizing susceptible high-risk groups, such as hemodialysis patients, against hepatitis B virus. However, hemodialysis patients may not develop seroprotective antibodies despite receiving high doses of the vaccine. Recent reports indicate that combined vaccination against hepatitis B and hepatitis A viruses may improve the immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccine in healthy individuals, but the effectiveness of this strategy in hemodialysis patients is unknown. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Hepatitis B virus-seronegative hemodialysis patients with undetectable antibody levels at baseline. INTERVENTION: Intramuscular administration of Twinrix (inactivated hepatitis A virus [720 ELISA units] and purified hepatitis B virus surface antigen [20 mug]; GlaxoSmithKline) and Engerix-B (purified hepatitis B virus surface antigen [20 mug]) at 0, 1, and 6 months plus Engerix-B, 40 mug, at month 2 (intervention arm) or Engerix-B, 40 mug, at 0, 1, 2, and 6 months (control arm). Both groups received a total dose of 160 mug of hepatitis B antigen. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the difference in seroprotection rates at 7 months, defined by antibody titers >10 mIU/mL. The secondary outcome was frequency of adverse events. MEASUREMENTS: Antibody response at months 3 and 7. RESULTS: 96 patients were enrolled, and 73 completed the investigation. At 3 months, there was no difference in the groups' seroprotection rates (25% vs 27%; P = 0.4). At the completion of the vaccination series, using per-protocol analysis, 27 of 40 (68%) and 16 of 33 (49%) had antibody titers >10 mIU/mL in the treatment and control groups, respectively (P = 0.05; RR, 1.4; absolute abatement, 19%). Intention-to-treat analysis showed 58% and 38% seroprotection rates in the treatment and control groups, respectively (P = 0.02; RR, 1.5; absolute abatement, 20%). There was no difference in adverse events. LIMITATIONS: Lack of evidence of long-term protection. CONCLUSION: Vaccination of hemodialysis patients with a combined hepatitis A and hepatitis B regimen resulted in a statistically significant and clinically important improvement in seroprotection against hepatitis B virus compared with hepatitis B monovalent vaccine.
机译:背景:疾病预防控制中心建议对易感染的高危人群(如血液透析患者)进行乙型肝炎病毒免疫。但是,尽管接受了大剂量的疫苗接种,血液透析患者仍可能不会产生血清保护性抗体。最近的报道表明,针对乙型肝炎和甲型肝炎病毒的联合疫苗接种可以改善健康个体中乙型肝炎疫苗的免疫原性,但是这种策略在血液透析患者中​​的有效性尚不清楚。研究设计:前瞻性随机对照试验。地点和参与者:乙型肝炎病毒血清阴性的血液透析患者,基线时抗体水平未检出。干预:在0,1时肌肉注射Twinrix(灭活的甲型肝炎病毒[720 ELISA单位]和纯化的乙型肝炎病毒表面抗原[20杯];葛兰素史克)和Engerix-B(纯化的B型肝炎病毒表面抗原[20杯])。 ,并在第2个月加上6个月Engerix-B(40杯)(干预组),或在0、1、2和6个月(对照组)用Engerix-B(40杯)进行干预。两组均接受总剂量为160杯的乙型肝炎抗原。结果:主要结果是抗体滴度> 10 mIU / mL定义的7个月血清保护率差异。次要结果是不良事件的发生频率。测量:在第3和第7个月的抗体反应。结果:招募了96例患者,其中73例完成了调查。 3个月时,各组的血清保护率没有差异(25%vs 27%; P = 0.4)。在完成疫苗接种系列后,使用按方案分析,在治疗组和对照组中,抗体滴度均> 10 mIU / mL,分别为40(68%)和16(33%)(P = 0.05; RR,1.4;绝对减排,19%)。意向性治疗分析显示,治疗组和对照组的血清保护率分别为58%和38%(P = 0.02; RR,1.5;绝对减排,20%)。不良事件没有差异。局限性:缺乏长期保护的证据。结论:与乙型肝炎单价疫苗相比,采用乙型肝炎和乙型肝炎联合治疗方案对血液透析患者进行疫苗接种可导致针对乙型肝炎病毒的血清保护具有统计学意义和临床重要意义的改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号