首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews >Intensive versus standard multifactorial cardiovascular risk factor control in screen‐detected type 2 diabetes: 5‐year and longer‐term modelled outcomes of the ADDITION‐Leicester study
【24h】

Intensive versus standard multifactorial cardiovascular risk factor control in screen‐detected type 2 diabetes: 5‐year and longer‐term modelled outcomes of the ADDITION‐Leicester study

机译:在筛选2型糖尿病中,密集型与标准多应类心血管危险因子控制:加薪 - 莱斯特研究的5年和长期模拟结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Aims Diabetes treatment algorithms recommend intensive intervention in those with a shorter duration of disease. Screening provides opportunities for earlier multifactorial cardiovascular risk factor control. Using data from the ADDITION‐Leicester study (NCT00318032), we estimated the effects of this approach on modelled risk of diabetes‐related complications in screen‐detected patients. Methods A total of 345 (41% South Asian) people with screen‐detected type 2 diabetes were cluster randomised to receive 5?years of (1) intensive multifactorial risk factor intervention or (2) standard treatment according to national guidance. Estimated 10 to 20‐year risk of ischaemic heart disease, stroke, congestive cardiac failure, and death was calculated using UK‐PDS risk equations. Results Compared with standard care, mean treatment differences for intensive management at 5?years were ?11.7(95%CI: ?15.0, ?8.4) and ?6.6(?8.8, ?4.4) mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively; ?0.27 (?0.66, ?0.26) % for HbA1c; and ?0.46(?0.66; ?0.26), ?0.34 (?0.51; ?0.18), and ?0.19 (?0.28; ?0.10) mmol/L for total cholesterol, LDL‐cholesterol, and triglycerides, respectively. There was no significant weight gain in the intensive group despite additional medication use. Modelled risks were consistently lower for intensively managed patients. Absolute risk reduction associated with intensive treatment at 10 and 20?years were 3.5% and 6.2% for ischaemic heart disease and 6.3% and 8.8% for stroke. Risk reduction for congestive heart failure plateaued after 15?years at 5.3%. No differences were observed for blindness and all‐cause death. Conclusion Intensive multifactorial intervention in a multi‐ethnic population with screen‐detected type 2 diabetes results in sustained improvements in modelled ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and congestive cardiac failure.
机译:摘要AIMS糖尿病治疗算法建议在患有较短疾病持续时间的人中强化干预。筛选为早期的多因素心血管风险因子控制提供了机会。使用来自附加莱斯特研究的数据(NCT00318032),我们估计这种方法对筛选患者糖尿病相关并发症的建模风险的影响。方法总共345名(41%的南亚)筛选2型糖尿病患者是随机的,随机接受5岁(1)年(1)年(1)个强化多学会风险因子干预或根据国家指导的标准治疗。估计使用UK-PDS风险方程计算缺血性心脏病,中风,充血性心力衰竭和死亡的10%至20年的风险。结果与标准护理相比,5岁的均值管理的平均治疗差异是?11.7(95%CI:?15.0,?8.4)和?6.6(?8.8,?4.4)mmHg,分别用于收缩和舒张血压; HBA1C的0.27(Δ0.66,β0.26)%;和?0.46(?0.66;?0.26),α0.34(?0.51;Δ0.18),分别为总胆固醇,LDL-胆固醇和甘油三酯的0.19(Δ0.28;β0.10)。尽管有额外的药物使用,但密集型群体中没有显着的体重增加。集中管理患者始终如一地降低了建模风险。缺血性心脏病的缺血性心脏病的绝对风险降低与10和20的强化治疗有关,缺血性心脏病的3.5%和6.2%,中风有6.3%和8.8%。在15岁以下的5.3%后,有效期为5.3%的充血性心力衰竭的风险降低。对于失明和全部导致死亡,没有观察到差异。结论筛选2型糖尿病患者的多族裔人群中的密集多学介入导致模拟缺血性心脏病,中风和充血性心力衰竭的持续改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号