首页> 外文期刊>Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis: JTH >Comparison of real world and core laboratory lupus anticoagulant results from the Antiphospholipid Syndrome Alliance for Clinical Trials and International Networking (APS ACTION) clinical database and repository
【24h】

Comparison of real world and core laboratory lupus anticoagulant results from the Antiphospholipid Syndrome Alliance for Clinical Trials and International Networking (APS ACTION) clinical database and repository

机译:真实世界和核心实验室狼疮抗凝血对临床试验和国际网络(APS诉讼)临床数据库和存储库的临床试验综合征成果的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Variability remains a challenge in lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing. Objective To validate LA test performance between Antiphospholipid Syndrome Alliance for Clinical Trials and International Networking (APS ACTION) Core laboratories and examine agreement in LA status between Core and local/hospital laboratories contributing patients to this prospective registry. Methods Five Core laboratories used the same reagents, analyzer type, protocols, and characterized samples for LA validation. Non‐anticoagulated registry samples were retested at the corresponding regional Core laboratories and anticoagulated samples at a single Core laboratory. Categorical agreement and discrepancies in LA status between Core and local/hospital laboratories were analyzed. Results Clotting times for the reference/characterized plasmas used for normalized ratios were similar between Core laboratories (CV 4%); precision and agreement for LA positive/negative plasma were similar (all CV ≤5%) in the four laboratories that completed both parts of the validation exercise; 418 registry samples underwent LA testing. Agreement for LA positive/negative status between Core and local/hospital laboratories was observed in 87% (115/132) non‐anticoagulated and 77% (183/237) anticoagulated samples. However, 28.7% (120/418) of samples showed discordance between the Core and local/hospital laboratories or equivocal LA results. Some of the results of the local/hospital laboratories might have been unreliable in 24.7% (41/166) and 23% (58/252) of the total non‐anticoagulated and anticoagulated samples, respectively. Equivocal results by the Core laboratory might have also contributed to discordance. Conclusions Laboratories can achieve good agreement in LA performance by use of the same reagents, analyzer type, and protocols. The standardized Core laboratory results underpin accurate interpretation of APS ACTION clinical data.
机译:摘要背景变异性仍然是狼疮抗凝血(LA)测试的挑战。目的验证抗磷脂综合征联盟对临床试验和国际网络(APS行动)核心实验室的核心实验室核心实验室的核心实验室协议,并在核心和地方/医院实验室之间审查患者对该前瞻性注册处的援助患者的协议。方法采用相同试剂,分析仪类型,协议和表征样品的五个核心实验室。在单一核心实验室的相应区域核心实验室和抗凝样品中重新测试非抗凝注册样本。分析了核心和地方/医院实验室之间的洛杉矶地位的分类协议和差异。结果用于标准化比率的参考/表征质量的凝血时间在核心实验室(CV 5)之间相似;在完成验证锻炼的两个实验室中,La阳性/阴性等离子体的精确和协议(全CV≤5%)是相似的(所有CV≤5%); 418注册表样本接受了LA测试。在87%(115/132)非抗凝和77%(183/237)抗凝样品中观察到核心和地方/医院实验室之间La正面/负面地位的协议。然而,28.7%(120/418)样品在核心和地方/医院实验室或等源La结果之间表现出不等调。本地/医院实验室的一些结果分别在24.7%(41/166)和23%(58/252)的总非抗凝和抗凝样品中不可靠。核心实验室的等因素结果也可能导致不间断。结论实验室可以通过使用相同的试剂,分析仪类型和协议来实现LA性能的良好协议。标准化的核心实验室结果基于APS动作临床数据的准确解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号