首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychoeducational assessment >Is the Child Really What's Being Rated? Sources of Variance in Teacher Ratings of Socioemotional Skills
【24h】

Is the Child Really What's Being Rated? Sources of Variance in Teacher Ratings of Socioemotional Skills

机译:孩子真的是被评价的吗? 社会经济技能的教师评级差异差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study examined three potential sources of variance in teacher ratings of the socioemotional skills of children: occasion, child, and teacher. The ratings were prepared using the Devereux Student Strengths Assessment. In total, 344 children were assessed in both the fall and spring of kindergarten and first grade, providing a total of 1,067 ratings across 106 teachers. We employed cross-classified random effects models to account for multiple occasions of measurement that were nested within both children and teachers, which allowed us to determine the amounts of variance attributable to occasion, children, and teachers. Overall, occasion accounted for the greatest proportion of variance (43%-50%) across a variety of socioemotional subscales, followed by child (36%-46%), and teacher (11%-16%). Findings suggest that caution is warranted when using these scales for high-stake decisions.
机译:本研究审查了儿童社会经济技能的教师评级的三种潜在的差异来源:场合,儿童和老师。 使用Devereux学生优势评估制备评级。 总共有344名儿童在幼儿园和春季进行评估,占地106名教师共提供1,067家。 我们雇用了交叉分类的随机效果模型,以考虑在儿童和教师中嵌套的多次测量,这使我们能够确定占运站,儿童和教师的方差数量。 总体而言,场合占各种社会间隙分类的最大比例(43%-50%),其次是儿童(36%-46%)和教师(11%-16%)。 调查结果表明,在使用这些尺度以获得高股权决策时,请谨慎谨慎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号