首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials >Comparison of lymphedema in patients with axillary lymph node dissections to those with sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by immediate and delayed ALND
【24h】

Comparison of lymphedema in patients with axillary lymph node dissections to those with sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by immediate and delayed ALND

机译:腋窝淋巴结清扫术与前哨淋巴结活检后立即和延迟ALND的淋巴水肿的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE:: The purpose of the study was to show that delayed axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has higher rates of lymphedema compared with immediate ALND, using data from NSABP-B32 at Beaumont Hospital. METHOD:: NSABP B-32 at Beaumont had 207 patients with follow-up data on 199 patients, randomizing clinically negative axilla to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)+ALND (GrA N=98), and SLNB+cytology±ALND (GrB N=101). All patients had preoperative volumetric arm measurements and only node negatives had routine postoperative measurements assessing lymphedema for 36 months. We contacted node-positive patients for postoperative measurements for this study. Twenty-four and 15 cytology-positive patients had SLNB+ALND in GrA and GrB, respectively (SubGrA1 N=24; SubGrB1 N=15). Fourteen hematoxylin and eosin-positive patients had delayed ALND (SubGrB2a N=14). RESULTS:: Lymphedema rate for node-positive SLNB+ALND was 10.3% [SubGrA1 (3/24)+SubGrB1 (1/15)=4/39] and node-negative SLNB+ALND was 6.8% (SubGrA2=5/74). Lymphedema was 14.3% for delayed ALND in SubGrB2a (2 of 14) and 0% for 72 SLNBs in SubGrB2b. Our study comparing immediate and delayed ALND lymphedema was not statistically significant (10.3% vs. 14.3%, P=0.65). Comparing node-negative ALND (SubGrA2= 5/74=6.8%) to node-positive ALND (A1+B1+B2a=6/53=11.3%) was not statistically significant (P=0.52). Comparing lymphedema for node-negative ALND (SubGrA2) to SLNB (SubGrB2b) only approached significance (6.8% vs. 0%, P=0.058). CONCLUSIONS:: The rate of lymphedema was higher in delayed ALND but not statistically significant. Comparison, however, is difficult, given the limited sample size. We urge the other centers of NSABP-B32 to validate this, by contacting the node-positive patients for measurements. The lymphedema rate for SLNB alone was 0% and approached statistical significance when compared with node-negative ALND.
机译:用途::该研究的目的是证明延迟的腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)与即刻ALND相比具有更高的淋巴水肿率,使用了博蒙特医院NSABP-B32的数据。方法:Beaumont的NSABP B-32患者207例,其中199例为随访数据,将临床阴性腋窝随机分为前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)+ ALND(GrA N = 98)和SLNB +细胞学±ALND(GrB) N = 101)。所有患者术前均进行了手臂测量,只有淋巴结阴性的患者进行了常规术后术后评估,评估了36个月的淋巴水肿。我们联系结节阳性患者进行这项研究的术后测量。 24名和15名细胞学阳性患者的GrA和GrB分别具有SLNB + ALND(SubGrA1 N = 24; SubGrB1 N = 15)。 14例苏木和曙红阳性患者的ALND延迟(SubGrB2a N = 14)。结果:淋巴结阳性SLNB + ALND的淋巴水肿率为10.3%[SubGrA1(3/24)+ SubGrB1(1/15)= 4/39],淋巴结阴性的SLNB + ALND为6.8%(SubGrA2 = 5/74 )。 SubGrB2a中延迟性ALND的淋巴水肿为14.3%(14个中的2个),SubGrB2b中72个SLNB的淋巴水肿为0%。我们比较立即性和延迟性ALND淋巴水肿的研究无统计学意义(10.3%对14.3%,P = 0.65)。节点阴性ALND(SubGrA2 = 5/74 = 6.8%)与节点阳性ALND(A1 + B1 + B2a = 6/53 = 11.3%)的比较在统计学上不显着(P = 0.52)。将淋巴结阴性的ALND(SubGrA2)与SLNB(SubGrB2b)的淋巴水肿进行比较仅达到显着性(6.8%vs. 0%,P = 0.058)。结论:延迟性ALND患者淋巴水肿的发生率较高,但无统计学意义。然而,鉴于样本量有限,比较是困难的。我们敦促NSABP-B32的其他中心通过联系淋巴结阳性患者进行测量来验证这一点。与淋巴结阴性ALND相比,仅SLNB的淋巴水肿率为0%,并接近统计学意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号