首页> 外文期刊>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology >Randomized trial of vonoprazan‐based versus versus proton‐pump inhibitor‐based third‐line triple therapy with sitafloxacin for Helicobacter pylori Helicobacter pylori
【24h】

Randomized trial of vonoprazan‐based versus versus proton‐pump inhibitor‐based third‐line triple therapy with sitafloxacin for Helicobacter pylori Helicobacter pylori

机译:基于vonoprazan的随机试验与基于质子泵抑制剂的第三线三线三线三种治疗,幽门螺杆菌幽门螺杆菌幽门螺杆菌

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract Background and Aim This was a prospective, randomized trial of the efficacy of vonoprazan‐based and proton‐pump inhibitor‐based 7‐day triple regimens with amoxicillin and sitafloxacin as a third‐line therapy for eradicating Helicobacter pylori after failure of clarithromycin‐based and metronidazole‐based first‐line and second‐line therapy. Methods We enrolled 63 patients positive for H.?pylori in whom first‐line and second‐line regimens for eradicating failed. Patients were randomized to the V‐AS group (vonoprazan 20‐mg bid, amoxicillin 750‐mg bid, and sitafloxacin 100‐mg bid for 7?days) or PPI‐AS group (esomeprazole 20‐mg bid, rabeprazole 10‐mg bid, or lansoprazole 30‐mg bid; amoxicillin 750‐mg bid; and sitafloxacin 100‐mg bid for 7?days). We assessed the outcome of eradication therapy using the 13 C‐urea breath test. We evaluated safety using patient questionnaires. This study was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000016336). Results The intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol eradication rates of V‐AS were 75.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 57.7–88.9%) and 83.3% (95% CI: 65.3–94.4%), respectively. The respective eradication rates of PPI‐AS were 53.3% (95% CI: 34.3–71.7%) and 57.1% (95% CI: 37.2–75.5%). In per‐protocol analyses, the eradication rate of the V‐AS group was significantly higher than that of the PPI‐AS group ( P ?=?0.043); however, no significant differences were observed in intention‐to‐treat analyses ( P ?=?0.071). Questionnaire scores did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusions The findings suggest that 7‐day triple therapy with vonoprazan, amoxicillin, and sitafloxacin is more effective than proton‐pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and sitafloxacin as a third‐line regimen for eradicating H.?pylori .
机译:摘要背景和宗旨是一种前瞻性,随机试验的vonoxazan和质子 - 泵抑制剂的7天三天的三重方案与阿莫西林和Sitafloxacin作为第三线疗法,用于在基于克拉霉素的循环霉素失败后消除幽门螺杆菌的第三线疗法和甲硝唑基的一线和二线治疗。方法我们注册了63名患者的H.?普罗尼患者,其中一线和二线方案用于根除失败。患者被随机化为V-AS组(vonoprazan 20-mg BID,Amoxicillin 750-mg BID,Sitafloxacin 100-Mg培育7?天)或PPI-as组(EsomePrazole 20-Mg Bid,Rabeprazole 10-Mg Bid ,或兰替唑30-mg培育;阿莫西林750mg培育;和Sitafloxacin 100-mg培育7?天)。我们评估了使用13 c-utea呼气测试来评估根除治疗的结果。我们评估了使用患者问卷的安全性。本研究在Umin临床试验登记处注册(UMIN0016336)。结果v-of v-m的意向治疗和每协定的根除率为75.8%(95%置信区间[CI]:57.7-88.9%)和83.3%(95%CI:65.3-94.4%)。 PPI的各自根除率 - 如53.3%(95%CI:34.3-71.7%)和57.1%(95%CI:37.2-75.5%)。在每协定分析中,V-as组的根除率明显高于PPI-as组(p?= 0.043);然而,在有意对治疗分析中没有观察到显着差异(P?= 0.071)。组的问卷分数在组之间没有显着差异。结论发现表明,7天与vonoxicillin和Sitafloxacin的三天三重治疗比质子泵抑制剂,阿莫西林和Sitafloxacin更有效,作为擦除H.?泊尔的第三线方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号