首页> 外文期刊>Journal of comparative psychology >Further evidence that mice learn a win-shift but not a win-stay contingency under water-escape motivation
【24h】

Further evidence that mice learn a win-shift but not a win-stay contingency under water-escape motivation

机译:进一步的证据表明,小鼠在水逃避动机下学习了胜利但不是赢得持续存在的应急

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Previous research (C. Locurto, C. Emidy, & S. Hannan, 2002) indicated that mice quickly learned a water-escape task under a win-shift contingency but did not exceed chance-level performance under a win-stay contingency. We examined the robustness of this conclusion in two experiments by varying procedural and temporal aspects of that earlier experiment. Results of both experiments indicated that the preference for win-shift learning in mice under water-escape motivation could not be attributed to procedural or design features of that earlier study and were independent of the influence of intertrial interval, normally a variable that produces strong effects on learning. In neither experiment did subjects exposed to a win-stay contingency perform at above-chance levels.
机译:以前的研究(C. Locurto,C. Temidy,&S. Hannan,2002)表明,小鼠在Win-Shift Consivency下迅速了解了水逃避任务,但在Win-Stay Tustiency下没有超过机会级别绩效。 通过改变早期实验的程序和时间方面,我们在两次实验中检查了这一结论的稳健性。 两个实验的结果表明,水逃逸动机下小鼠中的偏移学习的偏好不能归因于早期研究的程序或设计特征,并且与间隔间隔的影响无关,通常是产生强烈影响的变量 在学习。 在既没有实验中,受试者都会在持续的持续性暴露于持续的情况下表现在较高机会水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号