首页> 外文期刊>Learning & behavior >Win-stay and win-shift lever-press strategies in an appetitively reinforced task for rats
【24h】

Win-stay and win-shift lever-press strategies in an appetitively reinforced task for rats

机译:保持食欲增强的大鼠坚持食胜和换挡杠杆按压策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two experiments examined acquisition of win-stay, win-shift, lose-stay, and lose-shift rules by which hungry rats could earn food reinforcement. In Experiment 1, two groups of rats were trained in a two-lever operant task that required them to follow either a win-stay/lose-shift or a win-shift/lose-stay contingency. The rates of acquisition of the individual rules within each contingency differed: lose-shift and lose-stay rules were acquired faster than win-stay and win-shift rules. Contrary to a number of previous reports, the win-shift rule was acquired less rapidly than any of the other rules. In Experiment 2, the four rules were taught separately, but subjects still acquired the win-shift rule more slowly than any of the other rules.
机译:两项实验检查了获得成功的方法,即饥饿的老鼠可以获得食物补给。在实验1中,对两组大鼠进行了两杆操作性任务的训练,要求他们遵循获胜/失败/失败或获胜/失败/失败的偶然性。每个意外事件中单个规则的获得率各不相同:丢失转移和丢失停留规则的获取速度比赢得停留和赢得转移规则更快。与许多先前的报告相反,获胜转移规则的获取速度不及其他任何规则。在实验2中,这四个规则是分别教授的,但是受试者仍然比其他规则更慢地掌握了胜负转换规则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号