...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chromatography, B. Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences >Optimization and comparison of GC-FID and HPLC-ELSD methods for determination of lauric acid, mono-, di-, and trilaurins in modified coconut oil
【24h】

Optimization and comparison of GC-FID and HPLC-ELSD methods for determination of lauric acid, mono-, di-, and trilaurins in modified coconut oil

机译:GC-FID和HPLC-ELSD方法的优化与比较,用于测定改性椰油中的月桂酸,单酸,二硼和三硼素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Modified coconut oil (MCO) obtained from the glycerolysis of virgin coconut oil (VCO) and glycerol under various conditions should have different amounts of bioactive fatty acids (FAs) and acylglycerols (AGs). Methods were developed to analyze lauric acid (LA), monolaurin (ML), dilaurin (DL), and trilaurin (IL) in MCO samples using gas chromatography - flame ionization detector (GC-FID) and high performance liquid chromatography - evaporative light scattering detector (HPLC-ELSD). The purpose of this research is to optimize and compare CCFID and HPLC-ELSD methods for determination of LA, ML, DL, and TL in MCO samples. All the standard curves exhibited good linearity (R-2 = 0.9995), except for that of LA analyzed by HPLC-ELSD (R-2 = 0.9971). The limits of detection (LODs) and quantification (LOQs) were found to be in the range of 0.033-0.260 mg/ml and 0.099-0.789 mg/ml for the GC-FID method and 0.040-0.421 mg/ml and 0.122-1.277 mg/ml for the HPLC-ELSD method, respectively. The GC-FID method (LOD = 0.033 mg/ml) was more sensitive than HPLC-ELSD method (LOD = 0.421 mg/ml) and showed satisfactory recoveries for LA analysis while HPLC-ELSD method (LOD = 0.040 mg/ml) was more sensitive than GC-FID method (LOD = 0.260 mg/ml) and exhibited acceptable recoveries for TL analysis. Both methods were applied to determine the MCO samples-produced under varied conditions for glycerolysis. The results revealed that the developed GC-FID method is suitable for the quantification of LA, ML, and DL while the developed HPLC-ELSD method is appropriate for the determination of ML, DL, and IL. Both developed GC FID and HPLC-ELSD methods produced reproducible results for the determination of LA, ML, DL, and IL in MCO samples.
机译:在各种条件下从原始椰子油(VCO)和甘油的甘油分解获得的改性椰子油(MCO)应具有不同量的生物活性脂肪酸(FAS)和酰基甘油(AGS)。使用气相色谱 - 火焰离子化检测器(GC-FID)和高效液相色谱 - 蒸发光散射 - 蒸发光散射(GC-FID)和高效液相色谱 - 蒸发光散射(GC-FID)分析MCO样品中的月桂酸(La),单磺蛋白(ML),稀释素(D1)和三龙素(IL)探测器(HPLC-ELSD)。本研究的目的是优化和比较CCFID和HPLC-ELSD方法,用于测定MCO样品中的LA,ML,DL和TL。所有标准曲线都表现出良好的线性度(R-2& = 0.9995),除了通过HPLC-ELSD分析的LA(R-2 = 0.9971)。发现检测限(LOD)和定量(LOQ)为GC-FID法的0.09-0.260mg / ml和0.099-0.789mg / ml,0.040-0.421mg / ml和0.122-1.277分别为HPLC-ELSD方法Mg / ml。 GC-FID方法(LOD,比HPLC-ELSD方法更敏感(LOD = 0.421mg / ml),并且在HPLC-ELSD方法(LOD< =)时显示出LA分析的令人满意的回收率0.040mg / ml)比GC-FID方法更敏感(LOD = 0.260mg / mL),并表现出可接受的T1分析回收率。应用两种方法以确定在不同条件下产生的MCO样品,用于甘油解。结果表明,发育的GC-FID方法适用于La,Ml和DL的定量,而开发的HPLC-ELSD方法适用于ML,DL和IL的测定。发育的GC FID和HPLC-ELSD方法都产生了MCO样品中的La,Ml,DL和IL的可重复结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号