...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical laboratory analysis. >External quality assessment for PML‐RARα PML‐RARα detection in acute promyelocytic leukemia: Findings and summary
【24h】

External quality assessment for PML‐RARα PML‐RARα detection in acute promyelocytic leukemia: Findings and summary

机译:急性早产细胞白血病中PML-RARαPML-RARα检测的外部质量评估:调查结果和摘要

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background The confirmation of clinical diagnosis, molecular remission, and sequential minimal residual disease monitoring required PML‐RARα detection in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). The current status of PML‐RARα detection in various laboratories remains unknown. Methods In 2018, external quality assessment (EQA) for PML‐RARα detection was carried out in China. Three EQA sample panels for PML‐RARα isoform L/S/V were prepared by different mock leukocyte samples. The performances of PML‐RARα detection, including admission screening, and qualitative and quantitative detection by real‐time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT‐qPCR), were assessed based on APL simulated clinical case. Results The mock leukocyte samples met the requirements of a clinically qualified sample for PML‐RARα EQA panel. Among the laboratories, 13/50 (26.0%) were “competent,” 21/50 (42%) classified as “acceptable,” and 16/50 (32.0%) classified as “improvable.” One (1/50, 2.0%) laboratory reported one screening mistake. Twenty‐six (26/50, 52.0%) laboratories reported 29 false‐positive and 19 false‐negative results. Twenty‐three (23/50, 46.0%) laboratories reported 42 quantitative incorrect results. Conclusion Significant differences were not found in PML‐RARα detection performance among laboratories that used different extraction methods. The performances of qualitative and quantitative RT‐qPCR detection were worse accurate for PML‐RARα isoform V. Quantitative variation was higher for low‐level samples. Further continuous external assessment and education are needed in the management of PML‐RARα detection.
机译:背景技术临床诊断,分子缓解和序贯最小残留疾病监测的确认需要PML-RARα检测急性早幼粒细胞白血病(APL)。各种实验室中PML-RARα检测的当前状态仍然未知。方法在2018年,在中国进行了PML-RARα检测的外部质量评估(EQA)。通过不同的模拟白细胞样品制备PML-RARα同种型L / S / V的三个EQA样品板。基于APL模拟临床案例,评估了PML-RARα检测的性能,包括准入筛选和定性检测,通过实时定量逆转录PCR(RT-QPCR)进行评估。结果模拟白细胞样品符合PML-RARαEQA面板的临床合格样本的要求。在实验室中,13/50(26.0%)是“有能力的,”21/50(42%)归类为“可接受”,16/50(32.0%)归类为“可申报”。一(1/50,2.0%)实验室报告了一个筛选错误。二十六(26/50,52.0%)实验室报告了29个假阳性和19个假阴性结果。二十三(23/50,46.0%)实验室报告了42种定量不正确的结果。结论使用不同提取方法的实验室中PML-RARα检测性能中未发现显着差异。对于PML-RARα同种型V来说,定性和定量RT-QPCR检测的性能更差。对于低水平样品,定量变化较高。在PML-RARα检测中需要进一步持续的外部评估和教育。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号