首页> 外文期刊>Journal of addictive diseases: the official journal of the ASAM, American Society of Addiction Medicine >Tobacco-free grounds implementation in California residential substance use disorder (SUD) treatment programs
【24h】

Tobacco-free grounds implementation in California residential substance use disorder (SUD) treatment programs

机译:加利福尼亚州的无烟地面实施物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Smoke-free laws and policies have contributed significantly to the decline in smoking in the U.S, but are not often applied in high-prevalence smoking populations where they are most needed. Smoking among clients in publicly funded substance use disorder (SUD) treatment is 3-4 times higher than the general population, and little is known about tobacco policies programs have adopted. To identify the prevalence of tobacco-free grounds and other smoking policies in California's publicly funded, adult, residential SUD programs. Using a California DHCS contact list of 1,921 publicly funded, non-medical, SUD programs, 362 were eligible to participate in a brief semi-structured phone survey concerning indoor and outdoor smoking for staff and clients and other tobacco policies. Of 259 programs that completed the survey, 28 (10.8%) reported tobacco-free grounds. 91 (35.1%) expressed interest in implementing tobacco-free policies and 23 have plans to do so. Nearly all programs (n = 253, 97.7%) had some policy restricting e-cigarette use, and 110 (43.5%) of these reported a complete ban on e-cigarette use. 124 (47.9%) had policies prohibiting staff and clients smoking together. Most California residential SUD programs allow outdoor smoking for staff and clients and few have adopted tobacco-free grounds policies. Given the reported interest in adopting tobacco-free policies, the high density of smokers in the SUD population, and the association of tobacco-free policies with lower client and staff smoking rates, state licensing and regulatory agencies, as well as county health departments, should work with SUD programs to adopt tobacco-free policies.
机译:无烟的法律和政策对美国的吸烟下降作出了重大贡献,但通常不适用于他们最需要的高流行吸烟人口。在公共资助的物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗中的客户在普通人群中吸烟3-4倍,几乎不了解烟草政策计划所采用。确定加利福尼亚州的无烟地面和其他吸烟政策的普遍存在,公共资助的成人,住宅苏打计划。使用加州DHCS联系人列表1,921公共资助的非医疗,苏打计划,362有资格参加有关员工和客户以及其他烟草政策的室内和户外吸烟的简要半结构化电话调查。完成调查的259个计划中,28个(10.8%)报告烟草场地。 91(35.1%)表示令人兴趣地执行烟草政策,23个计划这样做。几乎所有计划(n = 253,97.7%)有一些限制电子烟机的政策,110(43.5%)这些报告完全禁止电子烟机。 124(47.9%)有禁止员工和客户一起吸烟的政策。大多数加利福尼亚州住宅仓库课程允许户外吸烟为员工和客户,很少采用烟草场地政策。鉴于报告的兴趣采取无烟害政策,苏打人口中吸烟者的高密度,以及与较低客户和员工吸烟率,国家许可和监管机构以及县卫生部门的无烟害政策的协会,应该与SUD计划合作,采用无烟草政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号