...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research >Longitudinal Effects of Teriparatide or Zoledronic Acid on Bone Modeling‐ and Remodeling‐Based Formation in the SHOTZ Study
【24h】

Longitudinal Effects of Teriparatide or Zoledronic Acid on Bone Modeling‐ and Remodeling‐Based Formation in the SHOTZ Study

机译:Teriparatide或唑妥酸对ShiSz研究中骨模拟和重塑的形成的纵向作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

ABSTRACT Previously, we reported on bone histomorphometry, biochemical markers, and bone mineral density distribution after 6 and 24 months of treatment with teriparatide (TPTD) or zoledronic acid (ZOL) in the SHOTZ study. The study included a 12‐month primary study period, with treatment (TPTD 20?μg/d by subcutaneous injection or ZOL 5?mg/yr by intravenous infusion) randomized and double‐blind until the month 6 biopsy (TPTD, n ?=?28; ZOL, n ?=?30 evaluable), then open‐label, with an optional 12‐month extension receiving the original treatment. A second biopsy (TPTD, n ?=?10; ZOL, n ?=?9) was collected from the contralateral side at month 24. Here we present data on remodeling‐based bone formation (RBF), modeling‐based bone formation (MBF), and overflow modeling‐based bone formation (oMBF, modeling overflow adjacent to RBF sites) in the cancellous, endocortical, and periosteal envelopes. RBF was significantly greater after TPTD versus ZOL in all envelopes at 6 and 24 months, except the periosteal envelope at 24 months. MBF was significantly greater with TPTD in all envelopes at 6 months but not at 24 months. oMBF was significantly greater at 6 months in the cancellous and endocortical envelopes with TPTD, with no significant differences at 24 months. At 6 months, total bone formation surface was also significantly greater in each envelope with TPTD treatment (all p ??0.001). For within‐group comparisons from 6 to 24 months, no statistically significant changes were observed in RBF, MBF, or oMBF in any envelope for either the TPTD or ZOL treatment groups. Overall, TPTD treatment was associated with greater bone formation than ZOL. Taken together the data support the view that ZOL is a traditional antiremodeling agent, wheareas TPTD is a proremodeling anabolic agent that increases bone formation, especially that associated with bone remodeling, including related overflow modeling, with substantial modeling‐based bone formation early in the course of treatment. ? 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
机译:摘要以前,我们在捕杀性研究中用Teriparatide(TPTD)或Zoldronic ant(ZOL)治疗后6至24个月的骨组织形态形态,生化标志物和骨密度分布。该研究包括12个月的初级研究期,治疗(通过静脉内输注通过皮下注射或ZOL 5?Mg / Yr的TPTD 20?μg/ d)随机分配和双盲直到6个月活检(TPTD,N?= ?28; ZOL,N?=?30可评估),然后开放标签,具有可选的12个月扩展,接收原始处理。第二个活检(TPTD,N?= 10; ZOL,N?= 9)。这里我们呈现关于重塑的骨形成(RBF),基于型骨形成的数据( MBF),并溢出基于模型的骨形成(IMBF,邻近RBF位点溢出),在松质,内腐蚀和骨膜信封中。在6和24个月的所有信封中的TPTD与Zol后,RBF显着更大,除了24个月的骨膜外壳。所有信封在6个月,但在24个月内,MBF在所有信封中明显大。在带有TPTD的松质和内腐蚀的包膜中,OMBF在6个月内明显更大,24个月没有显着差异。在6个月时,在每个封装中,在具有TPTD处理的每个封装中,总骨形成表面也明显更大(所有p?<0.001)。对于在6至24个月的组内比较,在RBF,MBF或OMBF中没有观察到TPTD或ZOL治疗组的任何围类的统计学上显着的变化。总体而言,TPTD治疗与比ZOL更大的骨形成有关。 Zol是一种传统的抗血换剂的数据支持,ZOL是一种传统的抗血换剂,Wheareas TPTD是增加骨形成的合成代谢剂,尤其是与骨重塑相关的骨质形成,包括相关溢流建模,在过程中早期具有大量建模的骨形成治疗。还2017年美国骨骼和矿物学研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号