首页> 外文期刊>Journal of behavioral education >Comparing Functional Behavior Assessment-Based Interventions and Non-functional Behavior Assessment-Based Interventions: A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Methodological Quality of Studies
【24h】

Comparing Functional Behavior Assessment-Based Interventions and Non-functional Behavior Assessment-Based Interventions: A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Methodological Quality of Studies

机译:比较基于功能行为评估的干预和非功能性行为评估的干预措施:对结果的系统审查和研究方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This review compared the effectiveness of functional behavior assessment-based interventions (FBAI) versus non-functional behavior assessment-based interventions (NFBAI) through an examination of 24 single-case design (SCD) studies that directly compared the effects of these intervention approaches. This review also systematically examined the quality of these studies. All of the reviewed studies reported relative effectiveness of FBAI over NFBAI in reducing problem behaviors, showing a higher percentage of behavior reduction in FBAI than NFBAI conditions. None of the reviewed studies met all of the What Works Clearinghouse Design Standards for SCD (Kratochwill et al. in Single-case designs technical documentation, 2010). We discussed methods of comparing the effects of FBAI versus NFBAI and made methodological suggestions for future research in this area.
机译:本综述比较了基于功能行为评估的干预措施(FBAI)与非功能性行为评估的干预措施(NFBAI)的有效性通过考试24个单案设计(SCD)研究,直接比较了这些干预方法的影响。 该审查还系统地检查了这些研究的质量。 所有审查的研究报告了FBAI对NFBAI在降低问题行为中的相对效力,表现出比NFBAI条件更高的行为百分比减少。 没有审查的研究均符合SCD的所有作品清算室设计标准(Kratochwill等人。在单案设计中,2010年)。 我们讨论了比较FBAI对NFBAI的影响的方法,并制定了该地区未来研究的方法论建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号