首页> 外文期刊>Journal of abnormal child psychology >A Neurocognitive Comparison of Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Trichotillomania (Hair Pulling Disorder)
【24h】

A Neurocognitive Comparison of Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Trichotillomania (Hair Pulling Disorder)

机译:儿科强迫症和三胞嘧啶的神经认知比较(头发拉紊乱)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and trichotillomania (hair pulling disorder, HPD) are both considered obsessive-compulsive and related disorders due to some indications of shared etiological and phenomenological characteristics. However, a lack of direct comparisons between these disorders, especially in pediatric samples, limits our understanding of divergent versus convergent characteristics. This study compared neurocognitive functioning between children diagnosed with OCD and HPD. In total, 21 children diagnosed with HPD, 40 diagnosed with OCD, and 29 healthy controls (HCs), along with their parents, completed self-/parent-report measures and a neurocognitive assessment battery, which included tasks of inhibitory control, sustained attention, planning, working memory, visual memory, and cognitive flexibility. A series of analyses of variance (or covariance) indicated significant differences between groups on tasks examining planning and sustained attention. Specifically, children in both the OCD and HPD groups outperformed HCs on a task of planning. Further, children with OCD underperformed as compared to both the HPD and HC groups on a task of sustained attention. No between group differences were found with respect to tasks of reversal learning, working memory, spatial working memory, visual memory, or inhibitory control. The implications these findings may have for future, transdiagnostic work, as well as limitations and future directions are discussed.
机译:由于共同的病因和现象学特征的一些迹象,强迫症(OCD)和Trichotilloman(毛发拉动障碍,HPD)被认为是强迫性和相关的疾病。然而,这些疾病之间缺乏直接比较,特别是在儿科样本中,限制了我们对不同于收敛特征的理解。该研究与诊断患有OCD和HPD的儿童之间的神经认知功能进行了比较。总共21例诊断出患有OCD的HPD,40名儿童,以及29例健康对照(HCS)以及父母,完成自我/母程报告措施和神经认知评估电池,包括抑制控制,持续注意的任务,规划,工作记忆,可视内存和认知灵活性。一系列方差(或协方差)分析在检查规划和持续关注方面的组之间的显着差异。具体而言,OCD和HPD组中的儿童在规划任务上表现优于HCS。此外,与HPD和HC组的持续关注的任务相比,具有OCD的儿童表现不佳。在逆转学习,工作记忆,空间工作记忆,视觉记忆或抑制控制的任务方面没有找到组差异之间的差异。讨论了这些发现可能具有未来,跨性能的工作以及局限性和未来方向的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号