首页> 外文期刊>JAIDS: Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes >Outcomes of Three- Versus Six-Monthly Dispensing of Antiretroviral Treatment (ART) for Stable HIV Patients in Community ART Refill Groups: A Cluster-Randomized Trial in Zimbabwe
【24h】

Outcomes of Three- Versus Six-Monthly Dispensing of Antiretroviral Treatment (ART) for Stable HIV Patients in Community ART Refill Groups: A Cluster-Randomized Trial in Zimbabwe

机译:稳定的HIV患者在社区艺术refill组中的三月六月六月分配的结果:在津巴布韦的群体随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Multimonth dispensing (MMD) of antiretroviral treatment (ART) aims to reduce patient-related barriers to access long-term treatment and improve health system efficiency. However, randomized evidence of its clinical effectiveness is lacking. We compared MMD within community ART refill groups (CARGs) vs. standard-of-care facility-based ART delivery in Zimbabwe. Methods: A three-arm, cluster-randomized, pragmatic noninferiority trial was performed. Thirty health care facilities and associated CARGs were allocated to either ART collected three-monthly at facility (3MF, control); ART delivered three-monthly in CARGs (3MC); or ART delivered six-monthly in CARGs (6MC). Stable adults receiving ART >= six months with baseline viral load (VL) <1000 copies/ml were eligible. Retention in ART care (primary outcome) and viral suppression (VS) 12 months after enrollment were compared, using regression models specified for clustering (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03238846). Results: 4800 participants were recruited, 1919, 1335, and 1546 in arms 3MF, 3MC, and 6MC, respectively. For retention, the prespecified noninferiority limit (-3.25%, risk difference [RD]) was met for comparisons between all arms, 3MC (94.8%) vs. 3MF (93.0%), adjusted RD = 1.1% (95% CI: -0.5% to 2.8%); 6MC (95.5%) vs. 3MF: aRD = 1.2% (95% CI: -1.0% to 3.6%); and 6MC vs. 3MC: aRD = 0.1% (95% CI: -2.4% to 2.6%). VL completion at 12 months was 49%, 45%, and 8% in 3MF, 3MC, and 6MC, respectively. VS in 3MC (99.7%) was high and not different to 3MF (99.1%), relative risk = 1.0 (95% CI: 1.0-1.0). VS was marginally reduced in 6MC (92.9%) vs. 3MF, relative risk = 0.9 (95% CI: 0.9-1.0). Conclusion: Retention in CARGs receiving three- and six-monthly MMD was noninferior versus standard-of-care facility-based ART delivery. VS in 3MC was high. VS in six-monthly CARGs requires further evaluation.
机译:介绍:抗逆转录病毒治疗的多月分配(MMD)旨在减少患者相关的障碍,以获得长期治疗,提高卫生系统效率。然而,缺乏其临床效果的随机证据。我们比较MMD在社区艺术品补充组(CARGS)与津巴布韦的基于标准的设施的艺术交付中。方法:进行三臂,簇随机化,务实的务实不合理试验。在设施(3MF,Control)中,将三十个医疗保健设施和相关的CARGS分配给一家艺术品(3MF,控制);艺术在Cargs(3MC)中每月提供三环;或艺术在Cargs(6MC)中六月交付。稳定的成年人接受艺术> =六个月,基线病毒负载(VL)<1000份/ ml有资格。使用为聚类指定的回归模型进行比较艺术护理(初级结果)和病毒抑制(VS)和病毒抑制(VS)(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03238846)。结果:招募了4800名参与者,1919,1335和1546分别分别在3MF,3MC和6MC中。为了保留,举行预先发现的非流体限制(-3.25%,风险差差[RD])在所有臂3MC(94.8%)与3MF(93.0%)之间进行比较,调整的RD = 1.1%(95%CI: - 0.5%至2.8%); 6MC(95.5%)对3MF:ARD = 1.2%(95%CI:-1.0%至3.6%);和6mc vs.3MC:ARD = 0.1%(95%CI:-2.4%至2.6%)。在12个月的VL完成分别为3MF,3MC和6MC的49%,45%和8%。 3MC中的vs(99.7%)高且不不同于3MF(99.1%),相对风险= 1.0(95%CI:1.0-1.0)。 vs在6mc(92.9%)与3MF中略微降低,相对风险= 0.9(95%CI:0.9-1.0)。结论:接受三月和六月MMD的鲤鱼的保留是非流量与护理标准的设施的艺术递送。 3MC中的vs很高。六月的CARGS vs需要进一步评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号