首页> 外文期刊>Disasters: The International Journal of Disaster Studies and Practice >Nature's impartiality, man's inhumanity: reflections on terrorism and world crisis in a context of historical disaster.
【24h】

Nature's impartiality, man's inhumanity: reflections on terrorism and world crisis in a context of historical disaster.

机译:自然的公正性,男人的不人道性:在历史灾难背景下对恐怖主义和世界危机的思考。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper compares the terrorist outrages of 11 September 2001 in New York City and Washington to the Lisbon earthquake of 1 November 1755. Both events occurred, literally out of the blue, at critical junctures in history and both struck at the heart of large trading networks. Both affected public attitudes towards disaster as, not only did they cause unparalleled destruction, but they also represented symbolic victories of chaos over order, and of moral catastrophism over a benign view of human endeavour. The Lisbon earthquake led to a protracted debate on teleology, which has some parallels in the debate on technological values in modern society. It remains to be seen whether there will be parallels in the reconstruction and the ways in which major disasters are rationalised in the long term. But despite the differences between these two events--which are obviously very large as nearly 250 years of history separate them and they were the work of different sorts of forces--there are lessons to be learned from the comparison. One of these is that disaster can contribute to a perilous form of self absorption and cultural isolation.
机译:本文将2001年9月11日的恐怖主义愤怒与华盛顿联系起来于1755年11月1日至1755年11月1日。这两个事件发生在历史中的关键时刻,两者都在大型贸易网络的核心中袭击。两者都影响公众对灾难的态度,而且它们不仅会导致无与伦比的毁灭,而且它们还代表了混乱的象征性的胜利,以及对人类努力的良性观点的道德灾难性。里斯本地震导致了关于电视学的延伸辩论,在近代社会的技术价值观中有一些相似之处。它仍有待观察重建中是否会有相似之处以及主要灾害在长期合理化的方式。但是,尽管这两个事件之间存在差异 - 这显然非常大,但近250年的历史分开它们,它们是不同种类的工作 - 有课程将从比较中学到。其中一个是灾难可以促进危险的自我吸收和文化孤立。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号