...
首页> 外文期刊>Trends in Ecology & Evolution >Undisciplined Thinking Facilitates Accessible Writing: A Response to Doubleday and Connell
【24h】

Undisciplined Thinking Facilitates Accessible Writing: A Response to Doubleday and Connell

机译:无纪律的思维促进了可访问的写作:对Doubleday和Connell的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In their recent paper, Doubleday and Connell touch on the importance of good scientific writing in promoting interdisciplinary research, noting that 'If difficult writing impedes communication within disciplines, it will certainly impede communication across disciplines'. The authors suggest that researchers who write in an accessible style will have their work glimpsed by academics in neighboring disciplinary fields or silos with these glimpses contributing to the innovation and discovery that are central to science. Doubleday and Connell note that learning to write accessibly requires a constant appreciation of style and its different forms. Here we draw on our experiences in interdisciplinary research to explore the idea that such collaborations may facilitate undisciplined thinking and development of writing styles. Specifically, we propose that working across disciplinary lines necessarily exposes researchers to new academic languages and cultures, highlights the limitations of their own, and encourages the development of new composite communication styles more accessible to readers of all disciplines.
机译:在他们最近的纸张中,Doubleday和Connell对良好的科学写作在促进跨学科研究方面的重要性,并指出“如果难写写作受到纪律的沟通,则肯定会阻碍跨学科的沟通。作者建议写入可访问风格的研究人员将在邻近纪律领域或孤岛上的学术界瞥见,这些瞥见是对科学核心的创新和发现有助于创新和发现。 Doubleday和Connell注意,学习写得可靠地需要对风格的不断欣赏及其不同的形式。在这里,我们借鉴了我们在跨学科研究方面的经验,以探讨这种合作可能有助于不受纪律的思维和发展写作风格的发展。具体而言,我们建议跨越纪律条件努力使研究人员对新的学术语言和文化公开,突出了自己的局限性,并鼓励开发所有学科的读者更容易获得的新复合通信风格。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号