...
首页> 外文期刊>Trends in Ecology & Evolution >Accuracy, inter-observer and intra-observer reliability in topography assessment of multifocal contact lens centration
【24h】

Accuracy, inter-observer and intra-observer reliability in topography assessment of multifocal contact lens centration

机译:高度,观察者间的观察者和观察者内部多焦点触点眼镜厘定的可靠性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy and reliability (inter and intra-observer) of a method to assess multifocal contact lenses (MCLs) centration using a corneal topography unit. Method: Daily-disposable MCLs (Fusion 1 day Presbyo) were fitted on both eyes of the subjects. For each lens fit a slit lamp digital picture and videokeratograph image were taken in a rapid but randomised sequence. Photo editing software was used to assess the position of the MCL centre with respect to pupil centre as taken from the slit lamp photograph. The position of the MCL centre was automatically detected as the point of maximum curvature from the videokeratography. Three further manual and qualitative procedures to detect MCL centre, comparing a template of CLs optic zones to the videokeratographic image were performed by 4 practitioners using 3 different algorithms to represent the topographic map. Each manual reading was repeated 3 times. Results: Twenty-two subjects (11 males) aged 22.8 1.9 years (range 20.8-27.0 years) were recruited. The accuracy of the 4 topographic assessments in determining the centre coordinates of the MCL with respect to SL assessment was good: no differences were found in the left eyes and although in the right eyes a more temporal and superior position of MCLs was determined (paired t-test, p < 0.05) the difference was clinically negligible (0.16 lus/minus> 0.36 mm horizontally, 0.23 +/- 0.48 vertically). Amongst the 4 practitioners one-way Anova for repeated measures showed no differences for any of the 3 manual assessments. Intra-class correlation coefficient was calculated among the 3 readings for each manual procedure and was very good (between 0.75 and 0.98) in 3 practitioners and moderate (between 0.49 and 0.92) in the fourth. Conclusions: The assessment of MCL centration by performing corneal topography over the MCL is an accurate method. Furthermore, inter and intra-practitioner reliability showed by manual procedures appeared very good.
机译:目的:评估使用角膜形貌单元评估多焦点隐形眼镜(MCLS)焦点的方法的准确性和可靠性(帧内观察者和帧内观察者)。方法:在受试者的两只眼睛上安装每日一次性MCLS(融合1天PREMBYO)。对于每个镜头,适用于狭缝灯数码图像和视频电动识别图像以快速但随机的顺序拍摄。使用照片编辑软件来评估MCL中心与从狭缝灯照片所取出的瞳孔中心的位置。 MCL中心的位置被自动检测为可从视频角度造影的最大曲率点。通过使用3种不同算法的4个从业者将CLS光学区域的模板比较到视频高音识别图像的三种进一步的手动和定性程序来检测MCL中心,使用3个不同的算法来表示地形图。每次手动读数重复3次。结果:22.8岁的二十二名受试者(11名男性)1.9岁(范围20.8-27.0岁)。在确定MCL的中心坐标相对于SL评估中的4个地形评估的准确性很好:左眼没有发现差异,尽管在右眼中,确定了MCLS的更多时间和优异的位置(配对 - 最低,P <0.05)差异在临床上可忽略不计(0.16 <加/减轻> 0.36mm,水平为0.23 +/- 0.48)。在4名从业者中,用于重复措施的单向ANOVA对于3个手动评估中的任何一个没有差异。在每个手动程序的3种读数中计算了类内相关系数,并且在3名从业者中非常好(0.75和0.98),并在第四个中适中(0.49和0.92)。结论:通过在MCL上进行角膜地形来评估MCl Quentration是一种准确的方法。此外,由手动程序显示的间际和现有医生可靠性非常好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号