...
首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants >Vitro Study of Bond Strength Between Abutments with Different Degrees of Convergence and Crowns by Pre-Bonding Method
【24h】

Vitro Study of Bond Strength Between Abutments with Different Degrees of Convergence and Crowns by Pre-Bonding Method

机译:通过预粘接法通过预粘接方法对不同程度的收敛性和冠之间的粘结强度的体外研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To investigate the optimal degree of convergence of the abutment with which the bond strength achieved by the pre-bonding method is comparable with that in direct bonding with a conventional degree of convergence. Materials and Methods: Abutments with 5.5-mm diameter, 5-mm height, 0.5-mm shoulder width, and three kinds of degrees of convergence (2, 4, and 6 degrees) were first designed by digital modeling. Their corresponding inner crowns were also modeled, and a gap of 40 mu m was kept between the abutment and the inner crown. Thirty abutments and 30 inner crowns were then lathed out from a titanium plate (10 sets per degree of convergence). Six groups were defined in this study, according to the different degrees of convergence and bonding methods (direct bonding, pre-bonding) (n = 10 sets). The samples handled with direct bonding would be cleaned for reuse in tests with pre-bonding. Temporary cement was used as an adhesive, and the bond strength was tested in each set of samples. The comparison among the results was performed by the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: The mean values of bond strength with direct bonding methods were 349.39 +/- 65.75 N, 316.49 +/- 54.22 N, and 277.49 +/- 56.96 N, and with pre-bonding methods were 279.35 +/- 48.58 N, 227.97 +/- 26.72 N, and 154.6 +/- 23.03 N, respectively (2, 4, and 6 degrees). No statistical difference was found among the values in direct bonding groups and, in pre-bonding groups, only the comparison between 2 and 6 degrees of convergence showed statistical significance (P = .000). Between different bonding methods, statistical differences were shown in abutments with 4 and 6 degrees of convergence (P = .006, P = .000), respectively. The bond strength with pre-bonding methods and 2 degrees of convergence showed no significant difference from that with direct bonding and 6 degrees of convergence. Conclusion: The bond strength was inversely proportional to the degree of convergence, and the bond strength of pre-bonding was lower than that of direct bonding with the same degree of convergence. When using the pre-bonding method, the bond strength between the abutment and inner crown with 2 degrees of convergence could be comparable with using the direct bonding method and abutments with conventional degrees of convergence.
机译:目的:研究预粘接方法所实现的抵靠的抵靠的邻接的最佳收敛程度与常规收敛程度的直接粘合相当。材料和方法:直径5.5毫米,高度,0.5毫米肩宽和三种收敛度(2,4和6度)的托管是由数字建模设计的。它们的相应内冠也被建模,并且在邻接和内冠之间保持40μm的间隙。然后从钛板(每次收敛程度为10套)输出30间基台和30个内冠。根据该研究定义了六组,根据不同程度的收敛和粘合方法(直接粘接,预粘合)(n = 10套)。将用直接粘接处理的样品清洁以进行预键合的测试。用临时水泥用作粘合剂,在每组样品中测试粘合强度。结果的比较是由Kruskal-Wallis测试进行的。结果:具有直接粘接方法的粘合强度的平均值为349.39 +/- 65.75n,316.49 +/- 54.22 n,277.49 +/- 56.96n,预粘接方法为279.35 +/- 48.58,227.97 +/- 26.72 n,分别为154.6 +/- 23.03 n(2,4和6度)。直接键合组的值中没有发现统计差异,并且在预粘合组中,只有2至6度的收敛性的比较显示出统计学意义(P = .000)。在不同的粘合方法之间,分别以4和6度的级联(P = .006,P = .000)显示统计差异。具有预粘合方法和2度收敛性的粘合强度显示出与直接粘合和6度的收敛无显着差异。结论:粘合强度与收敛程度成反比,预粘合的粘合强度低于与相同收敛程度的直接粘合。当使用预粘接方法时,具有2度的邻接和内冠之间的粘合强度可以使用直接接合方法和具有常规收敛性的直接粘合方法和基台。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号