首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >Acetabular and Femoral Anteversions in Standing Position are Outside the Proposed Safe Zone After Total Hip Arthroplasty
【24h】

Acetabular and Femoral Anteversions in Standing Position are Outside the Proposed Safe Zone After Total Hip Arthroplasty

机译:在总髋关节置换术后,常设位置的髋臼和股骨反射位于拟议的安全区之外

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Although most hip dislocations occur in either standing or sitting position, the safe zone for implant position is defined for the supine position. Our goal was to determine preoperative and postoperative pelvis and hip orientations and whether the safe zone defined in supine position can be used to assess standing radiographs. Methods Preoperative and postoperative three-dimensional EOS images were assessed in 66 total hip arthroplasty patients. None of the patients had dislocation within the follow-up period (12-36 months). The acetabular anteversion (both anterior pelvic plane [APP] and patient functional plane) and the femoral anteversion were measured. The sacral slope, pelvic version, pelvic inclination, and pelvic incidence were also measured. Results Acetabular anteversion increased postoperatively in both APP and patient functional plane ( P ? P =.0942). Sacral slope was 42.4° (?25.9° to 24°) preoperatively compared with 40.3° (?4.1° to 64.2°) postoperatively ( P =.013). Pelvic version changed from 15.2° (?10.4° to 43.8°) to 17.2° (?6° to 46.7°; P = 0.008). Pelvic inclination was 1.12° (?25.9° to 24°) before total hip arthroplasty and ?1.2° (?40.7° to 23.4°) postoperatively ( P =.005). Conclusion The acetabular and femoral implant orientations in standing position reside out of the safe zone in most patients. The APP is not vertical in standing position in most patients due to anterior or posterior pelvic tilt. The proposed safe zone in supine position may not be a useful measure in the assessment of standing radiographs of patients with significant anterior or posterior pelvic tilt. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series study.
机译:摘要背景虽然大多数髋关节脱位在站立或坐姿发生时,但为仰卧位定义用于植入位置的安全区域。我们的目标是确定术前和术后骨盆和髋关节方向,以及仰卧位置定义的安全区可用于评估站立射线照片。方法在66例髋关节关节成形术患者中评估术前和术后三维EOS图像。没有一个患者在随访期内脱位(12-36个月)。测量髋臼安踏(骨盆平面[APP]和患者功能平面)和股骨反转。还测量了骶坡,骨盆版,盆腔倾角和盆腔发射。结果在APP和患者功能平面中术后术后髋臼的抗动率(P?P = .0942)增加。术前骶坡为42.4°(Δ25.9°至24°),术后40.3°(Δ4.1°至64.2°)(p = .013)。骨盆版本从15.2°(?10.4°至43.8°)变为17.2°(?6°至46.7°; p = 0.008)。在总髋关节关节置换术之前,盆腔倾斜度为1.12°(?25.9°至24°),术后1.2°(Δ40.7°至23.4°)(p = .005)。结论大多数患者中常设位置中的髋臼和股骨植入方向驻留出来。由于前骨盆或后骨盆倾斜,大多数患者在大多数患者中,该应用程序在站立位置并不垂直。在仰卧位置的拟议安全区可能不是评估患者患者患者的静态或后骨盆倾斜的X型射线照片中的有用措施。证据水平IV,治疗案例系列研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号