首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Surgery >Initial experience with purely laparoscopic living‐donor right hepatectomy
【24h】

Initial experience with purely laparoscopic living‐donor right hepatectomy

机译:纯粹腹腔镜养老运动员右肝切除术的初步体验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background There may be concerns about purely laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) compared with open donor right hepatectomy, especially when performed by surgeons accustomed to open surgery. This study aimed to describe technical tips and pitfalls in PLDRH. Methods Data from donors who underwent PLDRH at Seoul National University Hospital between December 2015 and July 2017 were analysed retrospectively. Endpoints analysed included intraoperative events and postoperative complications. All operations were performed by a single surgeon with considerable experience in open living donor hepatectomy. Results A total of 26 donors underwent purely laparoscopic right hepatectomy in the study interval. No donor required transfusion during surgery, whereas two underwent reoperation. In two donors, the dissection plane at the right upper deep portion of the midplane was not correct. One donor experienced portal vein injury during caudate lobe transection, and one developed remnant left hepatic duct stenosis. One donor experienced remnant portal vein angulation owing to a different approach angle, and one experienced arterial damage associated with the use of a laparoscopic energy device. One donor had postoperative bleeding due to masking of potential bleeding foci owing to intra‐abdominal pressure during laparoscopy. Two donors experienced right liver surface damage caused by a xiphoid trocar. Conclusion Purely laparoscopic donor hepatectomy differs from open donor hepatectomy in terms of angle and caudal view. Therefore, surgeons experienced in open donor hepatectomy must gain adequate experience in laparoscopic liver surgery and make adjustments when performing PLDRH.
机译:背景技术与纯粹的腹腔镜供体右肝切除术(PLDRH)可能涉及纯腹膜切除术(PLDRH),特别是当由外科医生习惯开放手术的外科医生进行。本研究旨在描述PLDRH中的技术提示和陷阱。方法回顾性地分析了2015年12月和2017年7月在2017年12月间首尔国立大学医院捐助者的数据。分析终点包括术中事件和术后并发症。所有业务均由单个外科医生进行,具有在开放的活体供体肝切除术中具有相当大的经验。结果总共26个捐助者在研究间隔内接受纯腹腔镜右肝切除术。在手术过程中没有任何供体输血,而两次接受再次再次进食。在两个供体中,中间平面右上部深部分的解剖面不正确。一个捐赠者在尾叶横截面期间经历了门静脉损伤,并且一个发达的残余留下肝脏导管狭窄。一个捐赠者由于不同的接近角度经历了残余的门静脉角度,并且具有与使用腹腔镜能量装置相关的动脉损伤。由于在腹腔镜检查期间腹腔内压力掩蔽了潜在的出血焦点,一种供体具有术后出血。两个捐赠者经历了由剑状套管针引起的良好肝脏表面损伤。结论纯腹腔镜供体肝切除术不同于角度和尾部的开放供体肝切除术。因此,在开放供体肝切除术中经验的外科医生必须在腹腔镜肝脏手术中获得足够的经验,并在履行PLDRH时进行调整。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The British Journal of Surgery》 |2018年第6期|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Department of SurgerySeoul National University College of MedicineSeoul Korea;

    Department of SurgerySeoul National University College of MedicineSeoul Korea;

    Department of SurgerySeoul National University Bundang Hospital Seoul National UniversitySeoul;

    Department of SurgeryChonnam National University Medical School and HospitalGwangju Korea;

    Department of SurgeryChonbuk National University College of MedicineJeonju Korea;

    Department of SurgerySeoul National University College of MedicineSeoul Korea;

    Department of SurgerySeoul National University College of MedicineSeoul Korea;

    Department of SurgerySeoul National University College of MedicineSeoul Korea;

    Department of SurgerySeoul National University College of MedicineSeoul Korea;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 外科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号