首页> 外文期刊>The breast journal >The assessment of 8th edition AJCC prognostic staging system and a simplified staging system for breast cancer: The analytic results from the SEER database
【24h】

The assessment of 8th edition AJCC prognostic staging system and a simplified staging system for breast cancer: The analytic results from the SEER database

机译:第8版AJCC预后分期系统的评估及乳腺癌简化分期系统:SEER数据库的分析结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract The prognostic value of the prognostic staging system that incorporated estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor‐2 (Her‐2), and histological grade has been validated in breast cancer (BC) patients, but the staging system seems to be somewhat complex. Recently, an updated bioscore system based on these tumor biological factors was proposed. The purpose of this study was to compare the prognostic stratification between prognostic staging system of American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) and a simplified staging system based on the bioscore system and anatomic TNM staging for BC patients. A total of 44?593 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma who underwent radical resection between 2010 and 2011 were reviewed using the SEER database. The patients were reclassified into different groups according to the anatomic staging system, prognostic staging system, risk bioscore system, and simplified staging system, respectively. The prognostic differences between different groups were compared and clinicopathologic features were analyzed. The anatomic TNM staging failed to clearly distinguish the prognostic difference between stage IIIB and stage IIIC. Therefore, we proposed an adjusted anatomic staging, in which T1N3 and T2N3 were downstaged from stage IIIC to stage IIIB, and T4N2 was upstaged from stage IIIB to stage IIIC. Histological grade III, ER(?), PR(?), and Her‐2(?) were identified as independent prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis, and these factors were separately marked as 1 point. There were significant survival differences among different risk points except for the comparison between 0 and 1 point. The higher the risk points, the poorer the prognosis of BC patients. In addition, the curve distance between stage IIA and stage IIB was not significantly broaden according to the prognostic staging system. However, the prognostic stratification for BC patients could be significantly improved by the simplified staging system incorporated the bioscore system and adjusted anatomic staging. Several drawbacks may still exist in the prognostic staging system of AJCC. A simplified staging system that incorporated risk score system and the anatomic staging could provide more accurate prognostic information for BC patients.
机译:摘要在乳腺癌(BC)患者中验证了掺入雌激素受体(ER),孕酮受体(PR),人表皮生长因子-2(HER-2)和组织学等分的预后分期系统的预后值已被验证分期系统似乎有点复杂。最近,提出了一种基于这些肿瘤生物学因子的更新的Bioscore系统。本研究的目的是比较美国联合癌症(AJCC)的预后分期系统与BC患者的Bioscore系统和解剖学TNM分期的预后分层。使用Seer数据库审查了2010年和2011年间自由基切除的侵袭性导管癌的44岁患者进行了综述。根据解剖学分期系统,预后分期系统,风险Bioscore系统和简化的分期系统分别将患者重新分类为不同的组。比较不同基团之间的预后差异,分析了临床病理学特征。解剖学TNM分期未能明确区分阶段IIIB和II阶段之间的预后差异。因此,我们提出了一种调整后的解剖学分期,其中将T1N3和T2N3从II型到IIIB阶段倒置,并且将T4N2从第IIIB阶段施加到II阶段。组织学等级III,ER(α),Pr(?)和HER-2(?)被鉴定为多变量分析中的独立预后因素,这些因子单独标记为1点。除了0到1点之间的比较外,不同的风险点之间存在显着的生存差异。风险点越高,BC患者的预后越难。此外,根据预后分期系统,阶段IIA和阶段IIB之间的曲线距离不会显着宽泛。然而,通过掺入Bioscore系统和调整的解剖学分期,可以显着改善BC患者的预后分层。在AJCC的预后分期系统中仍可能存在几个缺点。一种简化的分期系统,即掺入风险评分系统和解剖学分期可以为BC患者提供更准确的预后信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号