...
首页> 外文期刊>Prevention science: the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research >Are All Program Elements Created Equal? Relations Between Specific Social and Emotional Learning Components and Teacher-Student Classroom Interaction Quality
【24h】

Are All Program Elements Created Equal? Relations Between Specific Social and Emotional Learning Components and Teacher-Student Classroom Interaction Quality

机译:是否创建了平等的程序元素? 特定社会与情感学习成分与教师学生课堂互动质量的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

School-based social and emotional learning (SEL) programs are presented to educators with little understanding of the program components that have the greatest leverage for improving targeted outcomes. Conducted in the context of a randomized controlled trial, the present study used variation in treatment teachers' (N = 143) implementation of four core components of the Responsive Classroom approach to examine relations between each component and the quality of teachers' emotional, organizational, and instructional interactions in third, fourth, and fifth grade classrooms (controlling for pre-intervention interaction quality and other covariates). We also examined the extent to which these relations varied as a function of teachers' baseline levels of interaction quality. Indices of teachers' implementation of Morning Meeting, Rule Creation, Interactive Modeling, and Academic Choice were derived from a combination of teacher-reported surveys and classroom observations. Ratings of teacher-student classroom interactions were aggregated across five observations conducted throughout the school year. Structural path models indicated that teachers' use of Morning Meeting and Academic Choice related to higher levels of emotionally supportive interactions; Academic Choice also related to higher levels of instructional interactions. In addition, teachers' baseline interaction quality moderated several associations such that the strongest relations between RC component use and interaction quality emerged for teachers with the lowest baseline interaction quality. Results highlight the value of examining individual program components toward the identification of program active ingredients that can inform intervention optimization and teacher professional development.
机译:基于学校的社会和情感学习(SEL)计划向教育工作者展示了对具有最大杠杆的计划组件,以改善有针对性的结果。在随机对照试验的背景下进行,目前的研究使用了治疗教师(n = 143)的变化,实施了响应课堂方法的四个核心组成部分,以检查每个部件与教师情感,组织的质量之间的关系。第三,第四和五年级教室的教学互动(控制前介入性互动质量和其他协变量)。我们还检查了这些关系随着教师基线的互动质量水平而变化的程度。教师实施早晨会议,规则创造,互动建模和学术选择的指标源自教师报告的调查和课堂观察的组合。师生课堂互动的评级在整个学年进行的五个观察结果中汇总。结构路径模型表明,教师使用早上会议和学术选择与更高水平的情感支持相互作用;学术选择也与更高水平的教学互动有关。此外,教师的基线互动质量适度若干关联,使得RC组件使用与基准相互作用质量最低的教师的相互作用和互动质量之间的最强关系。结果突出了将个别方案组件识别识别方案活性成分的价值,可通知干预优化和教师专业发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号