首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >Changes in US antidepressant and antipsychotic prescription patterns during a period of FDA actions.
【24h】

Changes in US antidepressant and antipsychotic prescription patterns during a period of FDA actions.

机译:在FDA动作期间,美国抗抑郁药和抗精神病药处方模式的变化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: To determine if paroxetine versus non-paroxetine selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) prescribing changed after the June 2003 FDA Paroxetine Public Health Advisory (PPHA) and if antidepressant and antipsychotic prescribing changed after the February 2004 FDA Advisory Committee Meeting (FDACM). METHODS: Ecologic analysis using estimates of patients dispensed antidepressants and antipsychotics, census data, and promotional spending data. Data sources were SDI: Vector One(R), US Census, and IMS Health(R). Measures were monthly use levels (number of patients dispensed antidepressants, antipsychotics, paroxetine, and non-paroxetine SSRIs prescriptions by age group per population count). Percent changes pre- to post-PPHA were used to assess changes in paroxetine versus non-paroxetine SSRIs prescribing. Interrupted time series (ITS) analysis was performed to examine use level changes post-FDACM by drug groups (all antidepressants and all antipsychotics). RESULTS: Post-PPHA mean paroxetine use levels decreased for all age groups (range: 5.5-34.1%). Mean non-paroxetine SSRIs use levels increased (range: 4.6-17.1%). Post-PPHA changes were greatest for 6-12 and 13-17 year olds. Decreased mean antidepressant drug use levels from pre- to post-FDACM were observed in all groups under 25 years old. A statistically significant decrease in the slopes from pre- to post-FDACM was observed for persons aged 13-17 and 18-24 years. The difference between the forecasted mean use level and the observed mean use level (in 12-month intervals) was statistically significant for all ages combined (-107.26; 95% CI: -166.32, -48.20) and 1-5 (-3.1; 95% CI: -4.62, -1.58), 6-12 (-36.02; 95% CI: -62.92, -9.12) and 25 years, and older groups (-83.17; 95% CI: -153.95, -12.39). For all age groups, decreases in the slopes of antipsychotic drugs use from pre- to post-FDACM were observed, although these slope changes were not statistically significant. The difference between the forecasted mean antipsychotic drugs use level and the observed mean use level (in 12-month intervals) was statistically significantly lower for all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressant use changed post-PPHA and -FDACM, with a differential pattern by age. There was no evidence of increased antipsychotic use post-FDACM. Ecologic data cannot determine if changes were due to depression not treated with medications or the prescribing of fewer antidepressants for other conditions.
机译:目的:确定帕罗西汀与非帕罗西汀选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRIS)在2003年6月的FDA帕罗西汀公共卫生咨询(PPHA)之后发生变化,如果在2004年2月FDA咨询委员会会议(FDACM)之后发生了抗抑郁药和抗精神病式处方。方法:使用患者分配抗抑郁药和抗精神病药,人口普查数据和促销支出数据的生态分析。数据来源是SDI:Vector One(R),美国人口普查和IMS Health(R)。措施每月使用水平(患者分配的抗抑郁药,抗精神病药,帕罗西汀和非帕罗西汀SSRIS按年龄群计数的处方处所处方)。 PPHA前的变化百分比用于评估帕罗西汀与非帕罗西汀SSRI处方的变化。进行中断的时间序列(其)分析进行了药物组(所有抗抑郁药和所有抗精神病药)检查使用水平变化。结果:PPHA后平均帕罗西汀使用水平降低,适用于所有年龄组(范围:5.5-34.1%)。平均非帕罗西汀SSRIS使用水平增加(范围:4.6-17.1%)。 PPHA后6-12和13-17岁的变化最大。在25岁以下的所有群体中观察到从前FDACM预先达到前FACM的平均抗抑郁药物使用水平。对于13-17岁和18-24岁的人,观察到从前FDACM预先衰减的统计学显着的降低。预测的平均用量与观察到的平均使用水平(以12个月间隔)之间的差异对于所有年龄组合的统计学意义(-107.26; 95%CI:-166.32,-48.20)和1-5(-3.1; 95%CI:-4.62,-1.58),6-12(-36.02; 95%CI:-62.92,-9.12)和25岁,较旧的群体(-83.17; 95%CI:-153.95,-12.39)。对于所有年龄组,观察到抗透视药物倾斜的降低,虽然这些坡度变化没有统计学意义。预测的平均抗精神病药物使用水平和观察到的平均使用水平(以12个月间隔)的差异对于所有年龄组的统计学上显着降低。结论:抗抑郁用途改变了PPHA和-FDACM,逐年差别模式。没有证据表明抗透视症状后FDACM。生态数据无法确定变化是否导致未用药物未治疗或对其他条件进行更少的抗抑郁药的规定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号