...
首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >Changes in US antidepressant and antipsychotic prescription patterns during a period of FDA actions.
【24h】

Changes in US antidepressant and antipsychotic prescription patterns during a period of FDA actions.

机译:在FDA行动期间,美国抗抑郁药和抗精神病药处方的变化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To determine if paroxetine versus non-paroxetine selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) prescribing changed after the June 2003 FDA Paroxetine Public Health Advisory (PPHA) and if antidepressant and antipsychotic prescribing changed after the February 2004 FDA Advisory Committee Meeting (FDACM). METHODS: Ecologic analysis using estimates of patients dispensed antidepressants and antipsychotics, census data, and promotional spending data. Data sources were SDI: Vector One(R), US Census, and IMS Health(R). Measures were monthly use levels (number of patients dispensed antidepressants, antipsychotics, paroxetine, and non-paroxetine SSRIs prescriptions by age group per population count). Percent changes pre- to post-PPHA were used to assess changes in paroxetine versus non-paroxetine SSRIs prescribing. Interrupted time series (ITS) analysis was performed to examine use level changes post-FDACM by drug groups (all antidepressants and all antipsychotics). RESULTS: Post-PPHA mean paroxetine use levels decreased for all age groups (range: 5.5-34.1%). Mean non-paroxetine SSRIs use levels increased (range: 4.6-17.1%). Post-PPHA changes were greatest for 6-12 and 13-17 year olds. Decreased mean antidepressant drug use levels from pre- to post-FDACM were observed in all groups under 25 years old. A statistically significant decrease in the slopes from pre- to post-FDACM was observed for persons aged 13-17 and 18-24 years. The difference between the forecasted mean use level and the observed mean use level (in 12-month intervals) was statistically significant for all ages combined (-107.26; 95% CI: -166.32, -48.20) and 1-5 (-3.1; 95% CI: -4.62, -1.58), 6-12 (-36.02; 95% CI: -62.92, -9.12) and 25 years, and older groups (-83.17; 95% CI: -153.95, -12.39). For all age groups, decreases in the slopes of antipsychotic drugs use from pre- to post-FDACM were observed, although these slope changes were not statistically significant. The difference between the forecasted mean antipsychotic drugs use level and the observed mean use level (in 12-month intervals) was statistically significantly lower for all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressant use changed post-PPHA and -FDACM, with a differential pattern by age. There was no evidence of increased antipsychotic use post-FDACM. Ecologic data cannot determine if changes were due to depression not treated with medications or the prescribing of fewer antidepressants for other conditions.
机译:目的:确定在2003年6月FDA帕罗西汀公共卫生咨询(PPHA)之后,帕罗西汀与非帕罗西汀选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)的处方是否发生变化,以及2004年2月FDA咨询委员会会议(FDACM)之后抗抑郁药和抗精神病药的处方是否发生变化。方法:采用对患者分配的抗抑郁药和抗精神病药,人口普查数据和促销支出数据的估算进行生态分析。数据来源为SDI:VectorOne®,美国人口普查和IMSHealth®。衡量指标为每月使用量(按人群计数的年龄组分配的抗抑郁药,抗精神病药,帕罗西汀和非帕罗西汀SSRI处方的患者人数)。 PPHA前后的变化百分比用于评估帕罗西汀和非帕罗西汀SSRI处方中的变化。进行了中断时间序列(ITS)分析,以检查FDACM后药物组(所有抗抑郁药和所有抗精神病药)的使用水平变化。结果:PPHA后所有年龄段的帕罗西汀平均使用量均下降(范围:5.5-34.1%)。非帕罗西汀SSRIs平均使用量增加(范围:4.6-17.1%)。 PPHA后的变化对6-12岁和13-17岁的孩子最大。在25岁以下的所有组中,均观察到从FDACM之前到之后的平均抗抑郁药物使用水平降低。在13岁至17岁和18岁至24岁的人群中,从FDACM之前到之后的坡度有统计学意义的下降。在所有组合年龄段(-107.26; 95%CI:-166.32,-48.20)和1-5(-3.1; 95%CI:-4.62,-1.58),6-12(-36.02; 95%CI:-62.92,-9.12)和25岁以上的人群(-83.17; 95%CI:-153.95,-12.39)。对于所有年龄组,从FDACM之前到之后,使用抗精神病药物的斜率都有所下降,尽管这些斜率变化在统计上并不显着。所有年龄组的预测平均抗精神病药物使用量水平与观察到的平均使用水平之间的差异(以12个月为间隔)在统计学上显着降低。结论:PPHA和-FDACM后抗抑郁药的使用发生了变化,年龄不同。没有证据表明FDACM后抗精神病药的使用增加。生态数据无法确定变化是否是由于未用药物治疗的抑郁症或针对其他情况的抗抑郁药处方减少所致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号