...
首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >Do the 2015 Beers Criteria predict medication-related harm in older adults? Analysis from a multicentre prospective study in the United Kingdom
【24h】

Do the 2015 Beers Criteria predict medication-related harm in older adults? Analysis from a multicentre prospective study in the United Kingdom

机译:2015 BEERS标准是否预测老年人的药物相关危害? 英国多中心前瞻性研究分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose To investigate whether inappropriate prescribing, defined by the Beers Criteria, is associated with medication-related harm (MRH), hospital admission, and mortality in older adults in England. Methods A multicentre, prospective cohort study recruited 1280 patients (median age 82 years) at hospital discharge. Patients were followed-up in the community by pharmacists for 8 weeks to identify MRH (harm from adverse drug reactions, non-adherence, and medication errors) and hospital admissions. One-year mortality was determined using hospital records. Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) were determined using the 2015 version of the Beers criteria. Logistic regression was used to investigate the relationship between patients prescribed PIMs and adverse outcomes. Results Two hundred and seventy-six patients (22%) were prescribed one or more PIMs at hospital discharge. The main PIM classes prescribed at hospital discharge were benzodiazepines and related drugs (30%) and antidepressants (27%). 1116 out of 1280 patients completed follow-up and 413 (37%) experienced MRH. In 51 cases (12%), MRH was attributable to a PIM. There was no significant relationship between patients prescribed PIMs and overall MRH, hospital readmission or all-cause one-year mortality. Multiple PIMs at discharge was independently associated with an increased risk of ADR (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.03-5.23). Conclusion The prescribing of PIMs is common at hospital discharge of older adults in England. The 2015 Beers criteria have a limited clinical value to predict adverse outcomes following hospital discharge in this setting.
机译:目的调查贝尔斯标准定义的不适当的处方是否与英格兰老年人的药物相关危害(MRH),住院入院和死亡率有关。方法采用多方形,前瞻性队列研究招聘了1280名患者(82岁82岁)在医院放电。患者被药剂师在社区中随访8周,以识别MRH(从不良药物反应,非依从性和药物错误)和医院入学。使用医院记录确定一年的死亡率。使用2015年版本的啤酒标准确定可能不恰当的药物(PIM)。逻辑回归用于研究规定PIMS和不利结果的患者之间的关系。结果二百七十六名患者(22%)在医院排放中规定了一个或多个PIM。医院排放处规定的主要PIM课程是苯二氮卓和相关药物(30%)和抗抑郁药(27%)。 1280名患者中的1116名完成后续行动和413(37%)有经验的MRH。在51例(12%)中,MRH可归因于PIM。在规定PIM和整体MRH,医院入院或全部导致的一年死亡率之间没有显着的关系。放电时的多个PIM与ADR的风险增加(或2.32,95%CI 1.03-5.23)的风险较多。结论PIMS的规定是英格兰老年人的医院排放。 2015年啤酒标准有限的临床价值,以预测本次环境中医院排放后的不利结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号