首页> 外文期刊>SIAM Journal on Computing >RANKING ON ARBITRARY GRAPHS: REMATCH VIA CONTINUOUS LINEAR PROGRAMMING
【24h】

RANKING ON ARBITRARY GRAPHS: REMATCH VIA CONTINUOUS LINEAR PROGRAMMING

机译:按任意图表排名:通过连续线性编程重新分离

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Motivated by online advertisement and exchange settings, greedy randomized algorithms for the maximum matching problem have been studied, in which the algorithm makes (random) decisions that are essentially oblivious to the input graph. Any greedy algorithm can achieve a performance ratio of 0.5, which is the expected number of matched nodes to the number of nodes in a maximum matching. Since Aronson, Dyer, Frieze, and Suen [Random Structures Algorithm, 6 (1991), pp. 29-46] proved that the modified randomized greedy algorithm achieves a performance ratio of 0:5 + epsilon (where epsilon = 1/400000) on arbitrary graphs in the midnineties, no further attempts in the literature have been made to improve this theoretical ratio for arbitrary graphs until two papers were published in FOCS 2012 [G. Goel and P. Tripathi, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 2012, pp. 718-727; M. Poloczek and M. Szegedy, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 2012, pp. 708-717]. In this paper, we revisit the ranking algorithm using the linear programming framework. Special care is given to analyze the structural properties of the ranking algorithm in order to derive the linear programming constraints, of which one known as the boundary constraint requires totally new analysis and is crucial to the success of our linear program (LP). We use continuous linear programming relaxation to analyze the limiting behavior as the finite LP grows. Of particular interest are new duality and complementary slackness characterizations that can handle the monotone and the boundary constraints in continuous linear programming. Improving previous work, this paper achieves a theoretical performance ratio of 2(5-root 7)/9 approximate to 0.523 on arbitrary graphs.
机译:通过在线广告和交换设置的动机,已经研究了最大匹配问题的贪婪随机算法,其中算法使得(随机)决定基本上忘记输入图。任何贪婪算法都可以实现0.5的性能比,这是最大匹配中的节点数量的预期节点的数量。由于aronson,dyer,frieze和suen [随机结构算法,6(1991),pp。29-46]证明了改进的随机贪婪算法实现了0:5 + epsilon的性能比(其中epsilon = 1/400000)在MIDNINETIES中的任意图中,已经没有进一步尝试文献,以改善任意图的这种理论比例,直到在FOCS 2012中发表了两篇论文[G. Goel和P.Tripathi,IEEE计算机社会,Los Alamitos,CA,2012,PP。718-727; M. Poloczek和M. Szegedy,IEEE计算机社会,Los Alamitos,CA,2012,PP。708-717]。在本文中,我们使用线性编程框架重新求解排名算法。特别注意分析排名算法的结构特性,以推导出线性编程约束,其中一个称为边界约束需要完全新的分析,对我们的线性程序(LP)的成功至关重要。我们使用连续的线性编程放松来分析有限LP的增长,分析限制行为。特别令人兴趣的是新的二元性和互补松弛特征,可以处理连续线性编程中的单调和边界约束。本文提高了以前的工作,在任意图表上实现了2(5根7)/ 9的理论性能比为0.523。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号