首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of pain >Pressure pain thresholds in adults with patellofemoral pain and patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis: a case-control study
【24h】

Pressure pain thresholds in adults with patellofemoral pain and patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis: a case-control study

机译:髌椎间露疼痛和PatellofeMoral关节骨关节炎的压力疼痛阈值:一个案例对照研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and aims: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) and patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis (PFJOA) are common non-self-limiting conditions causing significant pain and disability. The underlying pain pathologies lack consensus with evidence suggesting reduced pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) in adolescent females with PFP and individuals with knee osteoarthritis. A paucity of evidence exists for mixed-sex adults with PFP and PFJOA in isolation. Exploring if pain sensitisation is a dominant feature of PFP and PFJOA may have important implications for the delivery of a patient centred management approach. The primary aim was to measure local and remote PPTs in PFP and PFJOA patients compared to matched controls. Secondary aims were to evaluate the relationship between PPTs and (1) condition severity and (2) knee function. Methods: 13 PFP patients plus 20 matched controls and 15 PFJOA patients plus 34 matched controls were recruited from a UK mixed-sex adult population. Controls were matched on age, sex and activity level. Demographic details, Tegner activity level score, symptom duration, condition severity (Kujala and KOOS-PF scores for PFP and PFJOA, respectively) and knee function (Modified Whatman score rating of five single leg squats) were recorded. PPTs were measured at six sites: five local around the knee, one remote on the contralateral leg. Between-group differences were tested using a two-way mixed model analysis of variance with repeated measures. Strength of association between PPTs and condition severity and knee function were tested using Spearman's rank order correlation. Results: No statistically significant difference in PPTs were observed between the PFP patients [F(1,31) = 0.687, p = 0.413, n2 = 0.022] or PFJOA patients [F(l,47) = 0.237, p = 0.629, n|2=0.005] and controls. Furthermore, no correlation was found between PPTs and condition severity or knee function in PFP or PFJOA (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Results suggest mechanical pain sensitisation is not a dominant feature of UK mixed-sex adults with PFP or PFJOA. Implications: PFP and PFJOA remain persistent pain complaints which may not be well explained by objective measures of sensitivity such as PPTs. The findings suggest that peripheral pain processing changes leading to pain sensitisation is not a key feature in PFP or PFJOA. Instead the underlying pain pathway is likely to remain primary nociceptive, possibly with a subgroup of patients who experience pain sensitisation and might benefit from a more targeted management approach.
机译:背景和目的:Patellofemoral疼痛(PFP)和Patellofemoral关节骨关节炎(PFJOA)是常见的非自我限制条件,导致显着的疼痛和残疾。潜在的疼痛病理缺乏与有膝关节育脉和膝关节骨关节炎的青少年女性减少压力疼痛阈值(PPTS)的证据达成共识。在孤立的PFP和PFJOA的混合性成年人存在缺乏证据。探索疼痛致敏是PFP的主导特征,PFJOA可能对交付患者居中的管理方法具有重要意义。与匹配的对照相比,主要目的是测量PFP和PFJOA患者中的局部和远程PPT。次要目标是评估PPT和(1)条件严重程度与(2)膝关节函数之间的关系。方法:13例PFP患者加20种匹配对照,15名PFJOA患者从英国混合性成年人口招募了34名匹配对照。对照对年龄,性和活动水平匹配。记录了人口统计学细节,TEGNER活动水平评分,症状持续时间,条件严重程度(PFP和PFJOA的KOOS-PF分别)和膝关节函数(修改了五个单腿蹲的分数等级)。 PPT在六个地点测量:膝盖周围五个局部,在对侧腿上遥控。使用与重复措施的双向混合模型分析进行测试,测试了组之间的差异。使用Spearman的等级相关性测试PPT和条件严重程度和膝关节函数之间的关联强度。结果:在PFP患者之间没有观察到PPT的统计学意义差异[F(1,31)= 0.687,P = 0.413,N2 = 0.022]或PFJOA患者[F(l,47)= 0.237,p = 0.629,n | 2 = 0.005]和控制。此外,PFP或PFJOA中PPT和条件严重程度或膝关节函数之间没有发现相关性(P> 0.05)。结论:结果表明机械疼痛致敏不是英国混合性成年人的主要特征,PFP或PFJOA。含义:PFP和PFJOA保持持久的痛苦投诉,这些痛苦可能无法通过诸如PPT的敏感度的客观措施来解释。研究结果表明,外周疼痛处理导致疼痛致敏的变化不是PFP或PFJOA中的关键特征。相反,潜在的疼痛途径可能仍然是初级伤害,可能是一个体验疼痛致敏的患者亚组,可能会受益于更具有针对性的管理方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号