...
首页> 外文期刊>Oncoimmunology. >Impact of PD-L1 expression, driver mutations and clinical characteristics on survival after anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy versus chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized trials
【24h】

Impact of PD-L1 expression, driver mutations and clinical characteristics on survival after anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy versus chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

机译:PD-L1表达,司机突变和临床特征对抗PD-1 / PD-L1免疫疗法对非小细胞肺癌的化疗的影响:随机试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To investigate the impact of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, oncogenic mutations, and clinical characteristics on survival after treatment with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies versus chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods: This meta-analysis included randomized trials comparing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies with chemotherapy. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (Cl) for overall survival (OS) for the trial population and prespecified subgroups were extracted. We calculated pooled estimates of treatment efficacy using the fixed-effects or random-effects model when appropriate. All statistical tests were two sided. Results: Seven trials involving 3871 patients were included. The pooled results showed that anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy significantly prolonged OS (HR: 0.73; 95% Cl, 0.63 to 0.84) and PFS (HR: 0.84; 95% Cl, 0.71 to 0.99) compared to chemotherapy. OS benefit from immunotherapy were observed in all PD-L1 expression subgroups (negative: HR, 0.79; 95% Cl, 0.67 to 0.93; weak-positive: HR, 0.80; 95% Cl, 0.67 to 0.95; strong-positive: HR, 0.61; 95% Cl, 0.47 to 0.78). Strong-positive PD-L1 expression showed a trend towards more benefit compared to weak-positive PD-L1 expression (interaction P — 0.08). KRAS mutant (HR: 0.60; 95% Cl, 0.39 to 0.93), EGFR wild-type (HR: 0.73; 95% Cl, 0.61 to 0.87) and smoker (HR: 0.70; 95% Cl, 0.60 to 0.83) subgroups achieved significant OS benefit from immunotherapy compared to corresponding subgroups. Survival benefit to immunotherapy was not significantly associated with histology, CNS metastases, age, gender and performance status. Conclusion: This study confirmed that treatment with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 improves overall survival compared with chemotherapy. Benefit was seen, regardless of PD-L1 expression levels; however, PD-L1 strong-positive patients trended to have greatest benefit. Patients with a KRAS mutant or EGFR wild-type tumor have improved survival benefit from immunotherapy compared with KRAS wild-type or EGFR mutant NSCLC, respectively.
机译:目的:探讨编程死亡 - 配体1(PD-L1)表达,致癌突变和临床特征在用抗PD-1 / PD-L1抗体与非小细胞肺癌中的化疗进行存活后的临床特征的影响( NSCLC)。患者及方法:该荟萃分析包括随机试验比较抗PD-1 / PD-L1抗体与化疗。提取危险比率(HRS)和95%置信区间(HR)用于试验群体的总存活(OS)和预防亚组的总存活(OS)。我们在适当时计算使用固定效应或随机效应模型的治疗效果的汇集估计。所有统计测试都是双面的。结果:涉及七项试验涉及3871名患者。汇总结果表明,抗PD-1 / PD-L1免疫疗法显着延长OS(HR:0.73; 95%Cl,0.63至0.84)和PFS(HR:0.84; 95%Cl,0.71至0.99),相比化学疗法相比。在所有PD-L1表达亚组中观察到免疫疗法的OS益处(阴性:HR,0.79; 95%Cl,0.67至0.93; HR,0.80; 95%Cl,0.67至0.95;强阳性:HR, 0.61; 95%CL,0.47至0.78)。与弱阳性PD-L1表达相比,强阳性PD-L1表达表明更有效的趋势(相互作用P - 0.08)。 KRAS突变体(HR:0.60; 95%Cl,0.39至0.93),EGFR野生型(HR:0.73; 95%Cl,0.61至0.87)和吸烟者(HR:0.70; 95%Cl,0.60至0.83)亚组与相应的子组相比,免疫疗法的显着os受益。对免疫疗法的生存效益与组织学,CNS转移,年龄,性别和性能状况有显着相关。结论:本研究证实,与化疗相比,用抗PD-1 / PD-L1治疗改善了整体存活。无论PD-L1表达水平如何,都会看到受益;然而,PD-L1强阳性患者趋势有最大的好处。与KRAS野生型或EGFR突变NSCLC相比,患有KRAS突变体或EGFR野生型肿瘤的患者可以改善免疫疗法的生存益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号