...
首页> 外文期刊>Law and human behavior: The official journal of the American Psychology-Law Society >Adolescents' Cognitive Capacity Reaches Adult Levels Prior to Their Psychosocial Maturity: Evidence for a 'Maturity Gap' in a Multinational, Cross-Sectional Sample
【24h】

Adolescents' Cognitive Capacity Reaches Adult Levels Prior to Their Psychosocial Maturity: Evidence for a 'Maturity Gap' in a Multinational, Cross-Sectional Sample

机译:青少年的认知能力在他们的心理社会成熟前达到成人水平:跨国,横断面样本中“成熟度差距”的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

All countries distinguish between minors and adults for various legal purposes. Recent U.S. Supreme Court cases concerning the legal status of juveniles have consulted psychological science to decide where to draw these boundaries. However, little is known about the robustness of the relevant research, because it has been conducted largely in the U.S. and other Western countries. To the extent that lawmakers look to research to guide their decisions, it is important to know how generalizable the scientific conclusions are. The present study examines 2 psychological phenomena relevant to legal questions about adolescent maturity: cognitive capacity, which undergirds logical thinking, and psychosocial maturity, which comprises individuals' ability to restrain themselves in the face of emotional, exciting, or risky stimuli. Age patterns of these constructs were assessed in 5,227 individuals (50.7% female), ages 10-30 (M = 17.05, SD = 5.91) from 11 countries. Importantly, whereas cognitive capacity reached adult levels around age 16, psychosocial maturity reached adult levels beyond age 18, creating a "maturity gap" between cognitive and psychosocial development. Juveniles may be capable of deliberative decision making by age 16, but even young adults may demonstrate "immature" decision making in arousing situations. We argue it is therefore reasonable to have different age boundaries for different legal purposes: 1 for matters in which cognitive capacity predominates, and a later 1 for matters in which psychosocial maturity plays a substantial role.
机译:所有国家都区分了未成年人和成人的各种法律目的。最近的美国最高法院关于少年法律地位的案件已经咨询了心理学科学,以决定在哪里制定这些边界。然而,对于相关研究的稳健性,知之甚少,因为它在美国和其他西方国家进行了很大程度上。在立法者期待研究指导他们的决定的范围内,重要的是要知道科学结论是多么广泛。本研究审查了与对青少年成熟度的法律问题相关的2个心理现象:认知能力,底层逻辑思维和心理社会成熟度,这包括个人抑制自己的能力,面对情绪,令人兴奋或危险的刺激。这些构建体的年龄模式在5,227个个体(50.7%的雌性)中评估,来自11个国家的10-30岁(M = 17.05,SD = 5.91)。重要的是,而认知能力达到16岁左右的成人水平,心理社会成熟度达到18岁以上的成人水平,在认知和心理社会发展之间创造了“成熟度差距”。少年可能能够通过16岁以上的审议决策,但即使是年轻人也可能表现出“不成熟”的唤起情况的决策。因此,我们认为具有不同的法律目的的不同年龄界限是合理的:1对于认知能力占主导地位的事项,并且后来1对于这种心理社会成熟度发挥重要作用的事项。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号