...
首页> 外文期刊>Retinal cases & brief reports >EN FACE VERSUS 12-LINE RADIAL OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY SCAN PATTERNS FOR DETECTION OF MACULAR FLUID IN NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION
【24h】

EN FACE VERSUS 12-LINE RADIAL OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY SCAN PATTERNS FOR DETECTION OF MACULAR FLUID IN NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION

机译:en面对12行径向光学相干断层扫描模式,用于检测新生血管年龄相关性黄斑变性的黄斑液

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose: To compare fluid detection of autosegmented en face to 12-line radial spectral domain optical coherence tomography scan patterns in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Methods: Retrospective observational case series. Sixty-seven patients (94 eyes) with neovascular age-related macular degeneration underwent autosegmented en face optical coherence tomography (with associated 304-line raster scan) and 12-line radial scan patterns. Sensitivity and specificity of fluid detection for en face scan and 12-line radial scans were determined by combining radial and 304-line raster scans as a gold standard. Results: Two hundred and fifty-eight en face and 12-line radial spectral domain optical coherence tomography scans were interpreted. Seventy-five scans (58.1%) had fluid, whereas 54 scans (41.9%) did not. En face scan pattern fluid detection sensitivity and specificity was 89.3% and 61.1%, respectively. Twelve-line radial scan pattern fluid detection sensitivity and specificity was 97.3% and 100%, respectively. The difference in fluid detection between scan patterns was statistically significant (P = 0.01). Decreased central macular thickness was associated with false-positive (P = 0.035) and false-negative (P = 0.01) fluid detection on en face scans. Conclusion: En face optical coherence tomography alone is not as sensitive or specific as the 12-line radial scan pattern in detecting fluid in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. En face scans should be corroborated with other optical coherence tomography protocols to guide clinical decision making.
机译:目的:将自动分段的流体检测与12行径向谱域光学相干断层扫描模式进行比较,在新血管年龄相关的黄斑变性中。方法:回顾性观察案例系列。六十七名患者(94只眼)具有新生血管年龄相关的黄斑变性,接受了en自变成的en en光学相干断层扫描(具有相关的304线光栅扫描)和12行径向扫描图案。通过将径向和304线光栅扫描组合为金标准来确定对恩面扫描和12行径向扫描的流体检测的灵敏度和特异性。结果:解释了两百五十八个恩面和12行径向谱域光学相干断层扫描。七十五扫描(58.1%)有液体,而54扫描(41.9%)没有。 EN面部扫描模式流体检测灵敏度和特异性分别为89.3%和61.1%。 12行径向扫描模式流体检测灵敏度和特异性分别为97.3%和100%。扫描模式之间的流体检测的差异是统计学上的显着性(P = 0.01)。中央黄斑厚度下降与朝向扫描上的假阳性(P = 0.035)和假阴性(P = 0.01)流体检测相关。结论:仅en光学相干断层扫描不像在血管结合相关黄斑变性中检测流体的12行径向扫描模式一样敏感或特异。 en面扫描应用其他光学相干断层扫描协议进行证实,以指导临床决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号