首页> 外文期刊>Research and practice in intellectual and developmental disabilities. >A critical discourse analysis of the voices of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities within Australian community access service policies and practice: my voice, my policy
【24h】

A critical discourse analysis of the voices of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities within Australian community access service policies and practice: my voice, my policy

机译:澳大利亚社区接入服务政策和实践中具有智力和发展残疾人声音的关键话语分析:我的声音,我的政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Community access services are designed for people with disabilities to gain and use their abilities to enjoy their full potential for social independence. This research explored the extent to which the voices of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families and informal primary carers have contributed to Australian community access services policy in the twenty-first century. The research aimed to explore whether the voices of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families are present in Australian community access services policy; if community access services policies influence practice with regard to community participation and community inclusion; and what can be learnt from community access services policy and practice across Australia. A critical discourse analysis of Australian publicly available community access services extant texts, published between 2000 and 2014, was performed. The written evidence (n = 42) included strategic and operational policies and discussion papers. The voices of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families or informal primary carers were evident in 16 out of the 42 documents included in the study. Three key themes emerged that illustrate how policy and practice influenced community participation and community inclusion, including: "eligibility", "design and implementation", and "evaluation" of community access services. Discourse analysis highlighted inequity inherent in the language used in the documents studied, which continues to define and treat people with disabilities as a homogenous group to be managed separately. Findings from this study will contribute to strengthening community inclusion of people with disabilities by focusing on the inclusion of their voices in policies related to community participation and community access within Australia.
机译:社区访问服务专为残疾人而设计,以利用他们的能力来享受其充分的社会独立潜力。本研究探讨了知识分子和发展残疾人及其家庭和非正式主要护理人员的多大程度,为二十一世纪造成了澳大利亚社区访问服务政策。该研究旨在探讨澳大利亚社区访问服务政策的知识和发展障碍及其家人的人士是否存在智力和发展障碍的声音;如果社区访问服务政策对社区参与和社区纳入的策略影响实践;并且可以从社区访问服务政策和澳大利亚练习中学到什么。执行了2000年至2014年间公布的澳大利亚公共公共社区访问服务现存文本的关键话语分析。书面证据(n = 42)包括战略和业务政策和讨论文件。在研究中包含的42份文件中,有16个具有智力和发展残疾人及其家庭或非正式主要护理者的声音。出现了三个关键主题,说明了政策和实践如何影响社区参与和社区包容,包括:“资格”,“设计和实施”,以及社区访问服务的“评估”。话语分析突出了所研究文件中使用的语言固有的不平等,这继续定义和将残疾人视为均匀的群体。从本研究的调查结果将有助于加强群众通过纳入与澳大利亚社区参与和社区获取有关的政策中的声明来加强残疾人的群众。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号