首页> 外文期刊>Health communication >Space within the Scientific Discourse for the Voice of the Other? Expressions of Community Voice in the Scientific Discourse of Community-Based Participatory Research
【24h】

Space within the Scientific Discourse for the Voice of the Other? Expressions of Community Voice in the Scientific Discourse of Community-Based Participatory Research

机译:科学话语中的空间换了另一个? 社区参与研究科学话语中社区声音的表达

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) has captured public health attention and support because it is positioned as an approach that involves researchers and communities as equitable partners in addressing health disparities. However, it is unknown the extent to which CBPR creates a participatory space in the scientific discourse to signal "community voice," which we define as textual expression of community-centered perspectives on collective roles, interests, and worldviews. In this study, we utilized the culture-centered approach to examine the expression of community voice in the abstracts and public health relevance statements of 253 extramural CBPR projects in the U.S. that received funding from the National Institute of Health and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2009. We found that project abstracts and public health relevance statements contain four textual domains, or potential sites of contest to signal the articulation of community agency and voice within the CBPR projects. These domains include: 1) the rationale for the community health issue, 2) the roles of community partners, 3) community-centered outcomes of the partnership, and 4) elements of participatory research process. The degree of culture-centeredness of the texts is suggested in the extent to which articulations of community agency and voice are signaled across the four domains. We conclude that the dynamics of CBPR may shape culture-centered expressions of problem identification, solution configuration, structural transformations, reflexivity, values, and agency in the project abstracts and public health relevance statements.
机译:基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)已捕获公共健康注意力和支持,因为它被定位为一种涉及研究人员和社区作为公平合作伙伴解决健康差异的方法。然而,CBPR在科学话语中创造一个参与式空间的程度,以指示“社区声音”,我们将其定义为关于集体角色,利益和世界观的社区集中观点的文本表达。在这项研究中,我们利用了以文化为中心的方法来研究美国在美国国家卫生研究所和预防疾病控制和预防中心的资金的摘要和公共卫生相关声明中的摘要和公共卫生相关声明的表达。 2009年。我们发现项目摘要和公共卫生相关陈述包含四个文本域名,或潜在的比赛地点,以指示CBPR项目中社区机构和声音的阐述。这些域名包括:1)社区健康问题的理由,2)社区合作伙伴的角色,3)伙伴关系的社区中心成果,4)参与式研究过程的要素。提出了文本的培养中心程度,在社区机构和语音的铰接程度上横跨四个域名。我们得出结论,CBPR的动态可以在项目摘要和公共卫生相关陈述中塑造培养为中心的问题识别,解决方案配置,结构转换,反射性,值和机构的表达式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号