...
首页> 外文期刊>BJU international >Comparative evaluation of treatments for erectile dysfunction in patients with prostate cancer after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of treatments for erectile dysfunction in patients with prostate cancer after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

机译:根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术后前列腺癌患者勃起功能障碍治疗方法的比较评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a progressive local treatment protocol for erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients after undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 85 patients (mean age 59.5 years, range 50--75) with ED after RRP. Treatment was offered in four progressive phases, with patients passing to the next phase only if they failed the previous one: in phase I patients used a vacuum erection device; in phase II, sildenafil; in phase III, intracorporal injection; and in phase IV, intracorporal injection plus the vacuum erection device. The patients were followed for 1 year. RESULTS: Of the 85 patients, 78 (92%) responded to the vacuum erection device (with an erection sufficient for vaginal penetration), but only 11 (14%) agreed to continue with it at home. Of the remaining 74 patients, 69 with no contraindications were given sildenafil and 14 (20%) had a positive response. Sixty patients were then treated with intracorporal injection and 51 (85%) had a positive response; four of the nine failures in phase III responded to intracorporal injection plus vacuum therapy. Five patients failed all four protocols. After 1 year of follow-up, 76 of the 80 patients were successfully continuing treatment at home; seven (9%) used the vacuum erection device, 11 (14%) sildenafil, 54 (71%) intracorporal injection and four (5%) intracorporal injection plus the vacuum erection device. CONCLUSION: Overall, this progressive treatment method gave a positive response in 80 of the 85 patients (94%). After 1 year of follow-up, 76 of the 80 patients (95%) continued to respond well. Of all the methods used, intracorporal injection was the most effective for ED after RRP.
机译:目的:评估进行根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术(RRP)后的患者进行性勃起功能障碍(ED)进行性局部治疗方案的有效性。患者与方法:该研究纳入了RRP后ED的85例患者(平均年龄59.5岁,范围50--75)。治疗分为四个阶段,只有在前一个阶段失败的情况下,患者才能进入下一个阶段:在第一阶段,患者使用真空勃起装置;在第二阶段,西地那非;在第三阶段,体内注射;在第四阶段,体内注射加上真空勃起装置。随访1年。结果:在85例患者中,有78例(92%)对真空勃起装置有反应(勃起足以使阴道渗透),但只有11例(14%)同意在家中继续使用。在其余的74例患者中,有69例无禁忌症的患者接受了西地那非治疗,其中14例(20%)有阳性反应。然后60例患者接受了体内注射治疗,其中51例(85%)有阳性反应。在第三阶段的9个失败中,有4个是对体内注射加真空疗法的反应。五名患者未能通过所有四个方案。经过一年的随访,在80名患者中,有76名成功在家中继续治疗。七(9%)使用了真空勃起装置,11(14%)西地那非,54(71%)体内注射,四(5%)体内注射加上真空勃起装置。结论:总体而言,这种渐进治疗方法在85例患者中有80例(94%)获得了阳性反应。经过一年的随访,80例患者中有76例(95%)继续表现良好。在所有使用的方法中,体内注射对RRP之后的ED最有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号