首页> 外文期刊>Research in science education >Fostering Upper Secondary Students' Ability to Engage in Practices of Scientific Investigation: a Comparative Analysis of an Explicit and an Implicit Instructional Approach
【24h】

Fostering Upper Secondary Students' Ability to Engage in Practices of Scientific Investigation: a Comparative Analysis of an Explicit and an Implicit Instructional Approach

机译:培养高中学生参与科学调查实践的能力:明确和隐式教学方法的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Inquiry-based teaching is considered as contributing to content-related, procedural, and epistemic learning goals of science education. In this study, a quasi-experimental research design was utilized to investigate to what extent embedding inquiry activities in an explicit and an implicit instructional approach fosters students' ability to engage in three practices of scientific investigation (POSI): (1) formulating questions and hypotheses, (2) planning investigations, (3) analyzing and interpreting data. Both approaches were implemented in a classroom-based intervention conducted in a German upper secondary school (N = 222). Students' procedural knowledge of the three POSI was assessed with a paper-pencil test prior and post to the intervention, their content knowledge and dispositional factors (e.g., cognitive abilities) were gathered once. Results show that not only explicit but also implicit instruction fosters students' knowledge of POSI. While overall explicit instruction was found to be more effective, the findings indicate that the effectiveness depends considerably on the practice addressed. Moreover, findings suggest that both approaches were equally beneficial for all students regardless of their prior content knowledge and their prior procedural knowledge of POSI. Potential conditions for the success of explicit and implicit approaches as well as implications for instruction on POSI in science classrooms and for future research are discussed.
机译:基于探究的教学被认为是有关与科学教育的内容相关,程序和认识目标的贡献。在这项研究中,采用准实验研究设计来调查在明确和隐性教学方法中嵌入查询活动的程度,以及学生从事三项科学调查做法(POSI)的能力:(1)制定问题和假设,(2)规划调查,(3)分析和解释数据。两种方法都在德国上部中学的基于课堂的干预中实施(n = 222)。学生对三个POSI的程序知识通过先前的纸铅笔测试进行评估,并发布到干预,他们的内容知识和拟议因素(例如,认知能力)收集一次。结果表明,不仅明确而且隐含的指导促进了学生对POSI的了解。虽然发现整体明确指令更有效,但结果表明,有效性取决于解决方案的实践。此外,调查结果表明,这两种方法都对所有学生同样有益,无论其先前的内容知识及其先前的POSI程序知识。讨论了明确和隐含方法成功的潜在条件以及对科学教室中POSI指导和未来研究的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号